Loading market data...

CFTC Blocks Kalshi From Liquidating Sports Contracts Despite Michigan Court Order

CFTC Blocks Kalshi From Liquidating Sports Contracts Despite Michigan Court Order

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has stepped in to stop Kalshi from unwinding sports event contracts that a Michigan judge ordered canceled and refunded. The federal regulator's move leaves the state's ban on new sports betting derivatives in place, setting up a direct clash between state and federal authority over these novel financial products.

The Michigan court order

Earlier this month, a Michigan court ruled that Kalshi's sports event contracts—which let users bet on outcomes like whether a team would win a game—violated state law. The judge ordered the exchange to void all existing positions and return money to customers. Kalshi, a regulated derivatives exchange, had been offering these contracts under the CFTC's oversight.

CFTC's intervention

The CFTC responded by issuing its own order blocking Kalshi from liquidating the contracts. The federal agency argued that unwinding the trades would disrupt the integrity of the derivatives market and potentially harm investors who had already taken opposing positions. The CFTC's directive specifically protects completed trades from being reversed, even though the Michigan court demanded refunds.

What this means for existing contracts

For now, anyone who bought or sold a Kalshi sports contract before the Michigan ruling gets to keep their position. The CFTC order freezes the status quo on those trades. But the agency's action does nothing to lift Michigan's restriction on new sports contracts—those remain off-limits in the state. That means Kalshi can't offer fresh bets to Michigan residents, even though existing ones stay active.

Federal-state standoff

The situation is a rare direct confrontation between a state court and a federal regulator over control of a derivatives exchange. Michigan says the contracts are illegal gambling. The CFTC says they're legitimate futures products subject to federal commodities law. Neither side has budged. The conflict raises questions about who gets to decide what counts as a regulated financial instrument versus a state-prohibited wager.

Kalshi itself hasn't commented publicly on the dueling orders. The company continues to operate its exchange for other event contracts, but the sports line remains frozen in Michigan. The CFTC's order protects past trades but doesn't resolve the underlying legal dispute. That fight now appears headed for a higher court, where the boundaries between state gambling laws and federal commodities regulation will be tested.