Loading market data...

Crypto Scams Cost $17B Last Year, Pushing Risk Checks Into the Trading Flow

Crypto Scams Cost $17B Last Year, Pushing Risk Checks Into the Trading Flow

Roughly $17 billion disappeared into crypto scams last year, and a big share of it came from rug pulls and token launches that looked fine until they didn't. That loss figure is pushing more traders to run on-chain risk checks before they buy, and a handful of tools now fold those checks straight into the trading workflow.

Guardis puts the screen inside the trade

Guardis is built for Solana traders who want scam-risk analysis and execution in one place. It's non-custodial, and it uses Warden AI to assign every token a 0–100 risk score based on smart-contract vulnerabilities, suspicious wallet activity, and liquidity risk. The score sits in the trade flow, so a token can be filtered out before the order goes through.

The Smart Screener takes a different angle on wallets. Instead of ranking by size, it identifies wallets by historical trading performance and recurring on-chain behavior. That catches patterns that a big balance can mask.

Deployer history and multi-chain checks

For traders who want to investigate who actually launched a token, GMGN.AI is the strongest option. It digs into deployer and wallet histories, and it surfaces rug probability, security checks, and insider or sniper detection. The idea is to spot the wallets that dump on retail before the chart turns.

DEXTools covers similar ground across multiple chains, leaning on its DEXT Score, audit data, and holder and trader analysis. It's a broader sweep, useful when a project lives outside the Solana ecosystem.

Holder research and wallet clusters

Birdeye is the pick for market and holder research, with security checks and wallet analytics spanning several chains. It answers the quieter questions—who's holding, how concentrated is the supply, and whether the holders look real.

Bubblemaps takes a visual route. It maps connected wallet clusters to expose hidden concentration, insider activity, or coordinated ownership. A token can pass a contract audit and still fail this test, because the same three wallets often sit behind ten different addresses.

The tools were evaluated on four fronts: token-contract analysis, liquidity-risk detection, wallet intelligence, and holder analysis. None of them catch every scam, and the $17 billion figure is a reminder that the bar keeps moving. But the shift is real—risk screening is no longer a separate step. For Solana traders who want speed and safety in one window, Guardis is the fit. For anyone chasing a token across several chains, DEXTools and Birdeye cover more ground, and Bubblemaps is the last look before committing.