Loading market data...

WNBA Deletes Video of Reese, Bueckers $400 Bet, Declines to Discipline Players

WNBA Deletes Video of Reese, Bueckers $400 Bet, Declines to Discipline Players

The WNBA briefly posted a video on its social media accounts showing Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers agreeing to a $400 wager on their teams' next game. The league later removed the clip, calling the exchange lighthearted, and said it would not discipline either player. The decision comes despite a collective bargaining agreement that explicitly prohibits wagers and attempted wagers on WNBA competition.

The video and the bet

The now-deleted video captured Reese and Bueckers, two of the league's most prominent young stars, shaking hands on a $400 bet. The wager was tied to the outcome of their respective teams' upcoming matchup. The clip was posted on the WNBA's official social channels before being taken down. Neither player has publicly commented on the incident since the video was removed.

Why the league backed off

The WNBA said the exchange was lighthearted and not intended to violate league rules. Officials declined to issue any fine or suspension, even though the CBA language on gambling is broad. The league's statement did not explain how a public, televised bet between players differs from other prohibited wagers. The decision effectively treats the incident as a harmless joke rather than a rules violation.

The CBA and the precedent

The collective bargaining agreement bans players from betting on any WNBA game, including their own. The rule is meant to protect the integrity of the competition. By declining to act, the league may have created an awkward precedent: a bet is only a violation if the league says it is. Critics argue that selective enforcement could undermine the rule's credibility. Others note that the league likely wanted to avoid a public relations headache involving two marketable players.

What comes next

The WNBA has not announced any changes to its gambling policy or additional guidance for players. The incident raises a question the league will have to answer: if a public bet between stars is fine, where is the line?