Loading market data...

FTC Opens Inquiry Into OpenAI and Anthropic Over AI Safety Practices

FTC Opens Inquiry Into OpenAI and Anthropic Over AI Safety Practices

The Federal Trade Commission has opened an investigation into OpenAI and Anthropic, two of the leading artificial intelligence companies, over concerns about how they handle AI safety. The probe was first reported by Axios. It puts the agency's consumer-protection powers directly against the companies building the most widely used large language models.

The investigation could alter the competitive balance in the AI industry and reshape the regulatory landscape around model development. It also threatens to affect market confidence and the web of partnerships both companies have built with cloud providers, investors, and enterprise customers.

What the FTC is looking into

Details of the inquiry are still limited. Axios reported the investigation centers on AI safety concerns, but the agency has not publicly spelled out the specific statutes or practices under scrutiny. The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive business practices, and it can investigate whether companies misrepresent how their products work or what protections they offer. In the AI context, that could mean claims about model safety, testing, or risk mitigation.

Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic has issued a public statement in response to the reported probe. It's not clear whether the companies have received formal requests for documents or testimony, or whether the investigation is in an early, preliminary stage.

Why OpenAI and Anthropic are the focus

OpenAI and Anthropic are two of the most prominent AI developers in the world. OpenAI makes ChatGPT and the GPT series of models. Anthropic makes the Claude family of models and has positioned itself around safety research. Both companies have struck major partnerships: OpenAI with Microsoft, Anthropic with Google and Amazon. Those ties mean any regulatory action could ripple beyond the two firms themselves.

The FTC's interest reflects a broader push by regulators to understand how advanced AI systems are built and deployed. The agency has previously signaled interest in AI, but a formal investigation into two top labs is a more direct step. It signals that the commission is willing to use its investigative tools rather than wait for new AI-specific legislation.

What it could mean for the AI market

An investigation doesn't necessarily lead to enforcement. But the mere fact of a probe can change behavior. Companies under scrutiny often slow down product launches, review marketing language, and increase internal documentation. Partners and investors may also reassess risk. For OpenAI and Anthropic, which rely on large cloud and enterprise deals, a prolonged inquiry could complicate negotiations or add legal costs.

The competitive dynamics matter too. If one lab faces more regulatory pressure than another, it could affect hiring, fundraising, and customer adoption. Smaller AI developers may see an opening if the largest players are distracted. Or they may face similar scrutiny themselves if the FTC broadens its review.

The regulatory backdrop

The FTC's move comes as AI regulation remains fragmented in the United States. There is no comprehensive federal AI law. Instead, agencies like the FTC, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have each looked at AI through their existing mandates. The FTC has brought enforcement actions against companies for deceptive AI claims in the past, but those were smaller cases. An investigation into OpenAI and Anthropic would be the agency's highest-profile AI action to date.

Congress has held hearings on AI but has not passed major legislation. That leaves room for agencies to act. The FTC's investigation could set expectations for how AI companies describe their safety work and what they disclose to users and investors.

What happens next

The FTC has not set a public timeline for the investigation. It could take months or longer. The agency may issue subpoenas, interview employees, and review internal documents. If it finds evidence of deceptive practices, it could seek a consent order, fines, or changes to company behavior. If it finds nothing, the investigation could close without action.

For now, the key question is whether the probe stays narrow or expands. Axios reported it focuses on AI safety. But safety is a broad term, and the FTC has wide latitude to follow evidence where it leads. OpenAI and Anthropic will likely be watching for any formal requests. So will their partners, their rivals, and the investors who have poured billions into the sector.