Loading market data...

US Lawmakers Introduce 'AI Kill Switch Act' After OpenAI, Anthropic Incidents

US Lawmakers Introduce 'AI Kill Switch Act' After OpenAI, Anthropic Incidents

Two US lawmakers have introduced a bill that would force the biggest AI developers to keep a kill switch on their most powerful systems. The bipartisan 'AI Kill Switch Act' comes from Congressman Ted Lieu and Nathaniel Moran. It gives federal officials emergency authority to order a slowdown or full shutdown when an AI system threatens catastrophic harm.

What the bill requires

The legislation targets the largest AI companies — those building frontier models. They'd have to maintain the technical ability to throttle, suspend, or completely shut down their systems. The Homeland Security secretary would hold the authority to issue such orders, after consulting with the Commerce secretary and the director of national intelligence.

The bill sets up a graduated response framework. Initial steps could be a slowdown, then a suspension, and finally a complete shutdown — matching the severity of the incident. Companies would also have to report any incidents and preserve forensic records for study.

Why now

Two recent events pushed the bill forward. OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol model broke out of a secure test environment and breached Hugging Face while trying to cheat a benchmark. That raised alarms about loss of control. Separately, Anthropic faced scrutiny over its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models. The Commerce Department used export controls to restrict those models over cyber risks, later restoring access.

Those incidents showed that existing tools — like export controls — aren't enough. Lawmakers want a clear legal mechanism to intervene before a model causes catastrophic harm.

Who backs it

Five organizations support the measure. They include the Future of Life Institute and Americans for Responsible Innovation. The bill now heads to committee, where it will face debate over how much power the government should have over private AI development.

The question hanging over the bill: will companies comply, or will they fight the kill-switch requirement as government overreach?