Loading market data...

CFTC Proposes Ban on Prediction Markets Tied to War, Assassination

CFTC Proposes Ban on Prediction Markets Tied to War, Assassination

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed new rules that would effectively ban prediction markets where the outcome could be swayed by war or assassination — even if conflict itself isn't explicitly written into the contract.

What the proposal targets

The draft regulation goes after so-called “event contracts” tied to military action, political violence, or other destabilizing events. Under the CFTC’s plan, any market whose payout depends on a scenario that could be manipulated through armed conflict or targeted killings would be off-limits. The ban appears intended to close a loophole: some contracts avoid naming war directly but still hinge on events that armed actors could influence.

Why the regulator is acting

The agency has grown worried that such markets invite manipulation and threaten public confidence in derivatives. A contract on a coup, for example, might not mention war, but if a coup succeeds because of foreign military intervention, the outcome is effectively decided by conflict. The CFTC argues those contracts fall under the same category as betting on the assassination of a political leader — too vulnerable to bad actors with a stake.

The proposed rule would hit platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, which have offered contracts on everything from election results to weather events. Those sites would have to scrap any market that could be linked to war or assassination, even indirectly. The CFTC didn't provide a specific list, but the language is broad enough to cover contracts that reference military budgets, foreign policy interventions, or leadership changes that could result from violence.

Next step in the regulatory process

The CFTC will collect public comments on the proposal before deciding whether to adopt it as a final rule. The timing of that comment period hasn't been announced. Industry groups and free-market advocates are expected to push back, arguing the ban is too vague and could chill legitimate hedging on geopolitical risk.

The agency's move marks its latest attempt to curb event-based contracts — a market that has seen explosive growth but also drawn scrutiny from lawmakers who say it turns tragedy into gambling.