" (fee war = gebyrkrig)
Then: "Stablecoin issuers and traders keep picking Tron because transactions cost pennies, sometimes fractions of a penny. On busier networks, moving USDT or other stablecoins can set you back a few dollars or more. Tron's low fees make it practical for sending small amounts across borders or settling trades without eating into the principal."
Translation: "Stablecoin-udstedere og -handlere bliver ved med at vælge Tron, fordi transaktioner koster øre, nogle gange brøkdele af en øre. På travlere netværk kan det koste et par dollars eller mere at flytte USDT eller andre stablecoins. Trons lave gebyrer gør det praktisk at sende små beløb på tværs af grænser eller afvikle handler uden at tære på hovedstolen."
Note: "pennies" -> "øre" (Danish currency unit, but here it's figurative, so we can say "småbeløb" but to keep the meaning, we say "koster øre" but actually "penny" is a cent, so we might say "koster få cents" but the original says "pennies, sometimes fractions of a penny" so we can say "koster øre, nogle gange brøkdele af en øre" but in Danish, "øre" is a subunit of the krone, but it's understood as a small amount. Alternatively, we can say "koster få cents" but the original uses "pennies" so we'll keep "øre" for simplicity. Actually, to be precise, we can say "koster få cents" but then "fractions of a penny" would be "brøkdele af en cent". But since the context is crypto, we might just say "småbeløb". But to be faithful, I'll say "koster øre, nogle gange brøkdele af en øre" but that might sound odd. Better: "koster få cents, nogle gange brøkdele af en cent" but the original says "pennies" which is American, but we can translate as "cents" because it's about dollars. Actually, the article says "dollars" so we can use "cents" for consistency. So: "transaktioner koster få cents, nogle gange brøkdele af en cent." That's more accurate. I'll use that.
So: "Stablecoin-udstedere og -handlere bliver ved med at vælge Tron, fordi transaktioner koster få cents, nogle gange brøkdele af en cent. På travlere netværk kan det koste et par dollars eller mere at flytte USDT eller andre stablecoins. Trons lave gebyrer gør det praktisk at sende små beløb på tværs af grænser eller afvikle handler uden at tære på hovedstolen."
Third paragraph: "That utility has turned the network into a stablecoin pipeline. The $2 billion added in July is just the latest chunk in a steady stream. Crossing the $91 billion mark means Tron now holds a massive share of the global stablecoin market, a position built on speed and cost rather than flashy features."
Translation: "Den nytteværdi har gjort netværket til en stablecoin-pipeline. De 2 milliarder dollars, der blev tilføjet i juli, er blot den seneste del af en stabil strøm. At passere 91 milliarder dollars-mærket betyder, at Tron nu har en massiv andel af det globale stablecoin-marked, en position bygget på hastighed og pris frem for smarte funktioner."
Note: "utility" -> "nytteværdi" or "anvendelighed". "pipeline" -> "pipeline" (same). "chunk" -> "del" or "bidrag". "steady stream" -> "stabil strøm". "flashy features" -> "smarte funktioner" or "prangende funktioner". I'll use "smarte funktioner" but "flashy" implies showy, so maybe "prangende funktioner" but "smarte" is more common. I'll use "prangende" to keep the tone.
Fourth paragraph: "
The USDT dependence
" -> "
Afhængigheden af USDT
"
Then: "The bulk of Tron's stablecoin supply is USDT, the largest stablecoin by far. That reliance cuts both ways. It gives Tron a reliable, high-volume use case, but it also ties the network's fortunes to one asset and one issuer. If USDT ever faces a regulatory crackdown, a redemption crisis, or a shift in user preference, Tron's activity could dry up quickly."
Translation: "Størstedelen af Trons stablecoin-udbud er USDT, den klart største stablecoin. Den afhængighed virker begge veje. Den giver Tron et pålideligt og højvolumen-anvendelsestilfælde, men den binder også netværkets skæbne til
