Loading market data...

and content, but the content is a long explanation of how to write the article, not the final articl

and content, but the content is a long explanation of how to write the article, not the final articl

. We need to ensure word count 500-800. We'll aim for ~600. Now, produce JSON. Also meta description: 150-160 chars. Keywords: CRV, overbought, RSI, pullback, etc. Focus keyword: CRV overbought. Let's write. I'll draft the content. Lead: ..." That is not the article; it's a description of how to write the article. Then later, the user provides the actual article? Actually, after that, the user writes: "That's around 300 words. Need more. We can expand on the implications, but we don't have additional facts. We can talk about how traders often react to these signals, but we can't attribute. We can say 'Traders often view RSI above 70 as a sign to reduce long positions.' But that's not from facts, but it's general knowledge. We should be careful not to invent specific behaviors. We can say 'Such signals often lead traders to reduce exposure' but that is a general statement not a specific fact. It's acceptable to state general market behavior as long as it's not attributed to a specific source. The rule says no fabricated quotes or attributions. We can state general principles. But to