tags. Ensure natural flow.
Meta description: "AI is accelerating legal research by helping pinpoint authority and verify results. Harvey is set to play a key role in 2026 legal workflows." -> Persian.
Proper nouns: "Harvey" stays as "هاروی" or "Harvey"? Requirement says keep proper nouns in original form. So "Harvey" should remain as "Harvey" in English? But it's a name, in Persian text we often transliterate. The requirement says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - that means we should write them as they are in English, e.g., "Harvey" not "هاروی". However, in Persian text, it's common to write foreign names in Persian script. But the instruction is explicit: keep in original form. So I'll write "Harvey" in Latin letters within the Persian text? That might look odd. Alternatively, we can write it in Persian script but that would be a translation. I think the intent is to not translate the name, but we can use the Persian script for readability. The example in the original is "Harvey" - it's a proper noun. I'll write it as "Harvey" in English within the Persian text, as that is the original form. But in Persian articles, they often use Persian script for names. To be safe, I'll follow the instruction literally: keep in original form, so use "Harvey". However, the instruction says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - that likely means do not translate them, but you can still write them in the target script? For example, "Google" in Persian is often written as "گوگل" but that's a transliteration. The original form is "Google". I think the safest is to use the original Latin characters. But that might be confusing. Let's check the requirement again: "Use appropriate Persian terminology for crypto/tech terms" - for tech terms we translate. For proper nouns, keep original. So I'll keep "Harvey" as is.
Similarly, "AI" - we should translate as "هوش مصنوعی" (AI). "Legal research" -> "تحقیقات حقوقی". "Authority" in legal context means "مرجع" or "قانون معتبر"? "pinpoint authority" -> "تعیین دقیق مراجع قانونی". "verify results" -> "تأیید نتایج".
Let's write the Persian translation.
Title: "ابزار هوش مصنوعی Harvey نقشی کلیدی در تحقیقات حقوقی 2026 ایفا خواهد کرد" - but that mixes Persian and English. Perhaps better to write "ابزار هوش مصنوعی هاروی" using Persian script for Harvey? I'll decide to use Persian script for Harvey as "هاروی" because it's a common practice and the instruction says "keep proper nouns in original form" - I interpret that as not translating the meaning, but transliteration is acceptable. However, to be precise, I'll use "Harvey" in English. But then the title would be: "ابزار هوش مصنوعی Harvey نقشی کلیدی در تحقیقات حقوقی 2026 ایفا خواهد کرد" - that seems awkward. I'll use "هاروی" in Persian script. I think that's fine. Many Persian articles do that. I'll go with "هاروی".
Similarly in content.
Now translate each paragraph.
First paragraph: "Artificial intelligence is accelerating legal research by helping lawyers pinpoint authority and verify results faster than traditional methods. One AI platform, Harvey, is expected to play a central role in legal workflows by 2026, according to recent industry reports."
Translation: "هوش مصنوعی تحقیقات حقوقی را با کمک به وکلا برای تعیین دقیق مراجع قانونی و تأیید نتایج سریعتر از روشهای سنتی، تسریع میکند. بر اساس گزارشهای اخیر صنعت، یک پلتفرم هوش مصنوعی به نام Harvey انتظار میرود تا سال 2026 نقشی محوری در جریانهای کاری حقوقی ایفا کند."
But I used "Harvey" in English. Let's use "هاروی" for consistency. Or keep as Harvey? I'll keep as "Harvey" in English as per instruction. But then in Persian text, it's common to write foreign names in Persian script. The instruction says "keep proper nouns in original form" - original is Latin. So I'll keep Latin. I'll write "Harvey" in the Persian text. It might look a bit odd, but it's acceptable. I'll do that.
Second paragraph: "Legal research has long been a time-consuming task, requiring attorneys to sift through volumes of case law, statutes, and regulations. AI tools now streamline the process by quickly identifying the most relevant precedents and cross-checking citations for accuracy. This allows lawyers to focus on strategy and argument rather than manual searching."
Translation: "تحقیقات حقوقی مدتهاست که کاری زمانبر بوده و از وکلا میخواهد تا حجم زیادی از رویه قضایی، قوانین و مقررات را بررسی کنند. ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی اکنون این فرآیند را با شناسایی سریع مرتبطترین سوابق و بررسی متقابل استنادات برای دقت، سادهتر میکنند. این امر به وکلا اجازه میدهد تا به جای جستجوی دستی، بر استراتژی و استدلال تمرکز کنند."
Third paragraph: "Harvey is one of the AI platforms being integrated into law firm operations. It assists with tasks such as document review, contract analysis, and legal research. By 2026, Harvey is expected to be a standard part of many legal teams' toolkits, helping them handle increasing caseloads without sacrificing thoroughness."
Translation: "Harvey یکی از پلتفرمهای هوش مصنوعی است که در عملیات شرکتهای حقوقی ادغام میشود. این ابزار در کارهایی مانند بررسی اسناد، تحلیل قراردادها و تحقیقات حقوقی کمک میکند. انتظار میرود تا سال 2026، Harvey به بخش استاندارد جعبه ابزار بسیاری از تیمهای حقوقی تبدیل شود و به آنها کمک کند تا حجم پروندههای رو به افزایش را بدون کاهش دقت مدیریت کنند."
Fourth paragraph: "Law firms that adopt AI early may gain a competitive edge, reducing the time spent on research and improving the reliability of their work. The ability to quickly verify legal authority can also reduce the risk of errors in court filings and client advice. As the technology matures, more firms are likely to incorporate AI into their daily practice."
Translation: "شرکتهای حقوقی که زودهنگام هوش مصنوعی را به کار گیرند، ممکن است مزیت رقابتی کسب کنند، زمان صرفشده برای تحقیق را کاهش دهند و قابلیت اطمینان کار خود را بهبود بخشند. توانایی تأیید سریع مرجع قانونی همچنین میتواند خطر خطا در پروندههای دادگاه و مشاوره به مشتریان را کاهش دهد. با بلوغ این فناوری، شرکتهای بیشتری احتمالاً هوش مصنوعی را در عملکرد روزانه خود ادغام خواهند کرد."
Fifth paragraph: "The shift toward AI-assisted legal work raises questions about training and ethics. Lawyers will need to understand how to use these tools effectively and ensure they remain responsible for the final legal analysis. The bar for competence may evolve as AI becomes more common."
Translation: "تغییر به سمت کار حقوقی با کمک هوش مصنوعی سوالاتی درباره آموزش و اخلاق مطرح میکند. وکلا باید نحوه استفاده مؤثر از این ابزارها را درک کنند و اطمینان حاصل کنند که همچنان مسئول تحلیل نهایی حقوقی هستند. سطح صلاحیت ممکن است با رایجتر شدن هوش مصنوعی تکامل یابد."
Sixth paragraph: "For now, the focus is on integrating Harvey and similar platforms
