and meta description need translation as well.

And

. The lead is part of content. The market data snapshot is system-managed and injected after lead - but in the output we don't need to include it because it says "A live Market Data Snapshot is injected after the lead" - meaning the system will do it. So we just write the article text. We need to include the key facts: Kashkari says Treasury markets functioning well, Bessent announced plan to buy back long-term US debt, in response to rising yields. Neutral sentiment, short-term impact. We can use the "unique angle" about stealth liquidity injection. Also the "what most media missed" points. But we need to be factual and not overstate. We can mention that the buyback plan could inject liquidity if funded from Treasury General Account. But careful: we have no specific numbers. We can say "The Treasury's plan to buy back long-term debt could, depending on how it's funded, put cash into the system" - but that's analysis. We can frame it as a potential. But the rules say no hallucination - but we can use the internal analysis as it's given. Actually the facts include the "INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS" and "UNIQUE ANGLE" - but those are internal notes. The instruction says "Every named person, company... must come from the structured facts. Never invent entities." The intelligence analysis is not part of the "facts" per se, but it's given to us. We can use it as our reporting angle. We should not attribute quotes. We can paraphrase. We can say "The buyback, depending on how it's funded, could act as a liquidity injection" - that's an opinion/analysis, allowed as long as we don't invent specifics. We need to write 450-700 words. Let's structure: Lead: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari said Treasury markets are functioning well, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a plan to buy back long-term US debt. The statements came as concerns over rising Treasury yields. Then section 1: What Kashkari said - about market functioning. We can say his reassurance comes after a period of rising yields, and his choice of words suggests the Fed is watching closely. No direct quote. Section 2: Bessent's buyback plan - explain what it is, the purpose. We can note the plan is vague on details. Section 3: The liquidity angle - the buyback could inject cash if funded from the Treasury General Account. This is a potential tailwind for risk assets including crypto. But we need to be careful - we can say "The mechanics matter" - if Treasury uses cash from its General Account to buy bonds, it puts money back into the financial system. That's a real mechanism. Section 4: What to watch - the 10-year yield. A drop below 4.5% could be a catalyst. But we don't have actual yield numbers - but we can say "traders are watching the 10-year yield" - but no specific level? The analysis says 4.5% - but we can't invent a specific level unless it's in the facts. The facts don't mention 4.5%. Actually the intelligence analysis does. But the rule says "Don't insert prices, market caps, percentages" - it says "No inserted prices... RSI, support/resistance". A yield level might be considered a percentage. So we should not mention 4.5% or $77k etc. So we should say "traders will be watching the 10-year Treasury yield" without a specific number. Similarly avoid BTC price. Also avoid saying "Bitcoin" specifically? The market data is injected separately, but we can reference crypto as risk assets. We can say "crypto" generally. We need to avoid "industry experts" etc. We need to avoid the banned H2s. So use "What Kashkari said" - but that's not a noun phrase. "Kashkari's reassurance" or "Why the Fed is watching yields" etc. Let's draft: Title: "Treasury's Long-Debt Buyback Plan Raises Liqu