tags. We need to translate each paragraph and heading.
First paragraph: "The Senate will vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess, Senator Cynthia Lummis said. The announcement sets a firm timeline for the legislation, which has been a focus of debate on Capitol Hill."
Translate: "상원은 8월 휴회 전에 CLARITY 법안에 대해 표결할 것이라고 신시아 루미스 상원의원이 밝혔다. 이 발표는 의회에서 논쟁의 초점이 되어 온 법안에 대한 확실한 일정을 설정한다."
But we need to keep "Cynthia Lummis" as is? The instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so we keep "Cynthia Lummis" as "Cynthia Lummis" not "신시아 루미스". So we should write "Cynthia Lummis 상원의원" or just "Cynthia Lummis 의원". Also "Capitol Hill" is "의회" or "캐피톨 힐"? But it's a proper noun, we can keep as "Capitol Hill" or translate as "의회" but better to keep as "Capitol Hill" since it's a place. But requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so we keep "Capitol Hill" as is. So: "상원은 8월 휴회 전에 CLARITY 법안에 대해 표결할 것이라고 Cynthia Lummis 상원의원이 밝혔다. 이 발표는 의회에서 논쟁의 초점이 되어 온 법안에 대한 확실한 일정을 설정한다." But "의회" might be too generic; we can say "Capitol Hill" as "캐피톨 힐" but that's transliteration. Since it's a proper noun, we can keep as "Capitol Hill" in English. But in Korean text, it's common to keep English proper nouns. So I'll write "Capitol Hill" as is.
So first paragraph: "상원은 8월 휴회 전에 CLARITY 법안에 대해 표결할 것이라고 Cynthia Lummis 상원의원이 밝혔다. 이 발표는 Capitol Hill에서 논쟁의 초점이 되어 온 법안에 대한 확실한 일정을 설정한다."
But "Capitol Hill" might be understood. Alternatively, we can say "의회" but that loses specificity. I'll keep "Capitol Hill".
Second paragraph: "Lummis made the statement without providing a specific date. The August recess is a hard deadline for lawmakers, who typically leave Washington at the end of the month. A vote before then means the bill must clear procedural hurdles in the coming weeks."
Translate: "Lummis 의원은 구체적인 날짜를 제시하지 않고 이 같은 발언을 했다. 8월 휴회는 의원들에게 엄격한 마감 기한으로, 그들은 보통 월말에 워싱턴을 떠난다. 그 전에 표결이 이루어지려면 법안이 앞으로 몇 주 안에 절차적 장애물을 통과해야 한다."
We need to keep "Washington" as "워싱턴" or "Washington"? Since it's a proper noun, we can keep as "Washington" but in Korean we often write "워싱턴". The instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so we should keep "Washington" as "Washington". But that might be odd. Actually, "Washington" is a city name, it's a proper noun, so we can keep it as "Washington" in English. But in Korean text, it's common to write "워싱턴". However, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - that likely refers to personal names and company names, not necessarily place names. But to be safe, we can keep "Washington" as "Washington" or translate to "워싱턴"? I think it's fine to keep as "Washington" because it's a proper noun. But in Korean, we often transliterate. The instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - it doesn't explicitly mention places, but it says "names" which could include place names. I'll keep "Washington" as "Washington" to be consistent.
So: "Lummis 의원은 구체적인 날짜를 제시하지 않고 이 같은 발언을 했다. 8월 휴회는 의원들에게 엄격한 마감 기한으로, 그들은 보통 월말에 Washington을 떠난다. 그 전에 표결이 이루어지려면 법안이 앞으로 몇 주 안에 절차적 장애물을 통과해야 한다."
But "Washington" might be better as "워싱턴" but I'll keep as is.
Third paragraph: "The CLARITY Act has been in the works for months. A vote before the recess gives supporters a clear target. It also forces opponents to prepare their arguments. The Senate calendar is crowded, so the window for
