tags.
Title: "BNB Chain Sues Ex-Employee Over Seed Phrase Used to Launch Unauthorized Meme Token" -> "BNB Chain Menyaman Bekas Pekerja Kerana Frasa Pemulihan Digunakan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tidak Dibenarkan" but we might want to be more concise. Or "BNB Chain Saman Bekas Pekerja Berhubung Frasa Pemulihan yang Digunakan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tanpa Kebenaran" but we can keep it as "BNB Chain Menyaman Bekas Pekerja Kerana Frasa Pemulihan Digunakan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tidak Dibenarkan" - but "tanpa kebenaran" is better. Actually, the original says "Unauthorized" so "tidak dibenarkan" or "tanpa kebenaran". I'll use "tanpa kebenaran".
Let's do: "BNB Chain Menyaman Bekas Pekerja Kerana Frasa Pemulihan Digunakan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tanpa Kebenaran" but that is a bit long. Alternatively, "BNB Chain Saman Bekas Pekerja atas Frasa Pemulihan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tanpa Kebenaran" - but we need to keep the meaning. I'll go with: "BNB Chain Menyaman Bekas Pekerja atas Penggunaan Frasa Pemulihan untuk Melancarkan Token Meme Tanpa Kebenaran" - that is more natural.
But we'll see.
For content, we'll translate each paragraph.
Let's do it step by step.
First paragraph: "BNB Chain is taking legal action against a former employee who allegedly kept the seed phrase of a wallet created for a training video and used it to launch a meme token without company approval. The wallet and demo token were made solely for a how-to video and were never intended for trading, the company said. BNB Chain denies any association with the new token, stating it did not create, authorize, promote, or control it. Lawyers and police are involved, though the company has not disclosed the former employee's name, the token's name, or the jurisdiction of the lawsuit."
Translation: "BNB Chain sedang mengambil tindakan undang-undang terhadap bekas pekerja yang didakwa menyimpan frasa pemulihan dompet yang dicipta untuk video latihan dan menggunakannya untuk melancarkan token meme tanpa kelulusan syarikat. Dompet dan token demo itu dibuat semata-mata untuk video panduan dan tidak pernah dimaksudkan untuk perdagangan, kata syarikat. BNB Chain menafikan sebarang kaitan dengan token baharu itu, dengan menyatakan ia tidak mencipta, membenarkan, mempromosikan, atau mengawalnya. Peguam dan polis terlibat, walaupun syarikat tidak mendedahkan nama bekas pekerja itu, nama token, atau bidang kuasa tuntutan undang-undang."
We need to keep "seed phrase" as "frasa pemulihan" or "frasa benih"? I'll use "frasa pemulihan" as it's common. Also "demo token" is "token demo". "How-to video" is "video panduan". "Trading" is "perdagangan". "Denies any association" - "menafikan sebarang kaitan". "Lawyers and police" - "peguam dan polis". "Jurisdiction" - "bidang kuasa".
Second heading: "What the company says" -> "Apa yang syarikat katakan" or "Kenyataan syarikat" - I'll use "Apa kata syarikat" but better "Kenyataan syarikat". Actually, to keep parallel with original, I'll use "Apa yang syarikat katakan".
Paragraph: "BNB Chain made clear the token has no connection to the firm. The wallet was a throwaway for a tutorial — not a real project. The company said it did not authorize the launch and is pursuing legal remedies. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao weighed in, calling the former employee “basically a scammer.”"
Translation: "BNB Chain menjelaskan bahawa token itu tiada kaitan dengan syarikat. Dompet itu adalah dompet pakai buang untuk tutorial — bukan projek sebenar. Syarikat berkata ia tidak membenarkan pelancaran itu dan sedang menuntut remedi undang-undang. Pengasas Binance, Changpeng Zhao, turut mengulas, menyifatkan bekas pekerja itu sebagai “pada dasarnya penipu.”"
Third heading: "Why this case stands out" -> "Mengapa kes ini menonjol"
Paragraph: "This isn't a typical hack or exchange exploit. It's about a seed phrase that wasn't returned after an employee left. That makes the case unusual and potentially precedent-setting for how crypto firms handle staff exits. If BNB Chain wins, it could force companies to tighten offboarding procedures around wallet access and seed phrase custody."
Translation: "Ini bukan hack biasa atau eksploitasi pertukaran. Ini mengenai frasa pemulihan yang tidak dipulangkan selepas pekerja meninggalkan syarikat. Ini menjadikan kes itu luar biasa dan berpotensi menetapkan duluan untuk cara firma kripto mengendalikan pemergian kakitangan. Jika BNB Chain menang, ia boleh memaksa syarikat untuk memperketatkan prosedur pelepasan pekerja berkaitan akses dompet dan penjagaan frasa pemulihan."
We need to translate "hack" as "hack" (common) or "penggodaman"? I'll use "penggodaman" but "hack" is also used. I'll use "penggodaman" for consistency. "Exchange exploit" - "eksploitasi pertukaran" but maybe "eksploitasi bursa" (exchange is bursa in Malay). Actually, "exchange" in crypto context is often "bursa" or "pertukaran". I'll use "bursa" because it's more common. But to be safe, I'll use "pertukaran" as in "exchange". Actually, in Malaysia, they say "bursa" for stock exchange, but for crypto exchanges, they might say "platform dagangan". But I'll keep "pertukaran" as it's literal. Alternatively, "eksploitasi platform" but let's stick with "eksploitasi pertukaran". I'll use "eksploitasi bursa" since it's more specific. But to avoid confusion, I'll use "eksploitasi bursa" but then "exchange" is "bursa". Actually, the original says "exchange exploit" meaning an exploit of an exchange. I'll translate as "eksploitasi bursa". Also "hack" can be "penggodaman". So: "Ini bukan penggodaman biasa atau eksploitasi bursa."
Fourth heading: "Market snapshot" -> "Gambaran pasaran" or "Ringkasan pasaran" - I'll use "Gambaran pasaran".
Paragraph: "BNB's price was $579.62 at the time of reporting, down 2% in a day, with
