...
etc. Second heading: "A label that flexes" -> "Label yang fleksibel" or "Label yang berkuasa" but "flexes" means shows power. Maybe "Label yang berkuasa" or "Label yang boleh diubah". Actually "flexes" as in shows its power. So "Label yang menunjukkan kuasa" but that's long. Maybe "Label yang fleksibel" is not accurate. Let's think: The label is a policy lever, not objective. So "Label yang boleh diubah" or "Label yang lentur". I'll go with "Label yang lentur" but that might be odd. Alternatively "Label yang berkuasa" - but the meaning is that the label can be flexed, i.e., changed. So "Label yang boleh diubah" is clear. But we need to keep it short. I'll use "Label yang fleksibel" but that's not exactly. Actually "flexes" here means it has power to change. So "Label yang berkuasa" might be better. Let's see the context: "A label that flexes" - the label is a policy lever. So "Label yang boleh diubah" is fine. I'll use "Label yang boleh diubah" but that's a bit long. Maybe "Label yang lentur" - flexible. I'll go with "Label yang lentur" but it's not common. Let's use "Label yang berkuasa" - but that doesn't convey the changeability. Actually "flexes" means it can be bent, so "Label yang boleh dilentur" - but that's awkward. I'll use "Label yang fleksibel" - it's acceptable in Malay. But to be more natural, "Label yang boleh diubah" is better. I'll go with "Label yang boleh diubah" but it's a bit long. Since it's a heading, we can keep it short: "Label yang fleksibel" is fine. I'll use that. Second paragraph: "The list of state sponsors carries heavy sanctions and legal restrictions. Taking Syria off it means Washington now treats the Damascus government as a partner worth working with, despite al-Sharaa's past. The same administration that once hunted him now holds him up as a legitimate leader. That's not a shift in the threat itself; it's a shift in political convenience. The label is a policy lever, not an objective measure of danger." Translation: "Senarai penaja negara membawa sekatan berat dan sekatan undang-undang. Mengeluarkan Syria daripadanya bermakna Washington kini menganggap kerajaan Damsyik sebagai rakan yang layak bekerjasama, walaupun masa lalu al-Sharaa. Pentadbiran yang sama yang pernah memburunya kini menganggapnya sebagai pemimpin yang sah. Itu bukan perubahan dalam ancaman itu sendiri; ia adalah perubahan dalam kemudahan politik. Label itu adalah tuas dasar, bukan ukuran bahaya yang objektif." We need to keep "Washington" as is, "Damascus" as "Damsyik" (common Malay). "al-Sharaa" as is. Now the market snapshot div: We need to translate the text inside. The div has inline styles, we keep them. The content: "📊 Market Data Snapshot" -> "📊 Ringkasan Data Pasaran" or "📊 Data Pasaran Ringkas". We'll use "📊 Ringkasan Data Pasaran". Then the labels: "24h Change" -> "Perubahan 24j" (j for jam). "7d Change" -> "Perubahan 7h" (h for hari). "Fear & Greed" -> "Ketakutan & Ketamakan" but often used as is. We'll translate: "Ketakutan & Ketamakan". Then the value "65 Greed" -> "65 Tamak" but we can keep "Greed" as is? Better to translate: "65 Tamak" but the original has "Greed" in English. We'll translate to "Tamak". "Sentiment" -> "Sentimen". "slightly bullish" -> "sedikit menaik" or "sedikit bullish" - we can use "sedikit menaik" but "bullish" is common in Malay finance. I'll use "sedikit menaik" but to be safe, "sedikit bullish" is also acceptable. I'll use "sedikit menaik" for naturalness. Then "Bitcoin (BTC):" stays. "$78,352" stays. "Rank #1" -> "Kedudukan #1" or "Kedudukan #1". We'll use "Kedudukan #1". We need to preserve the HTML structure exactly, just translate the text content. Next heading: "Crypto's terror narrative" -> "Naratif keganasan kripto" or "Naratif keganasan kripto". I'll use "Naratif keganasan kripto". Next paragraph: "That disconnect matters for crypto. For years, regulators and lawmakers have cited terrorist financing as a reason to tighten the screws on digital assets. The Treasury has sanctioned crypto addresses, and the industry has spent millions on compliance to prove it's not a haven for bad actors. But if Washington can now legitimize a former al-Qaeda fighter as a head of state, the claim that crypto is uniquely dangerous because it might be used by a militant group loses some of its punch. The same logic that puts a terrorist past aside in foreign policy should apply to the way crypto is treated." Translation: "Pemutusan itu penting bagi kripto. Selama bertahun-tahun, pengawal selia dan penggubal undang-undang telah memetik pembiayaan keganasan sebagai alasan untuk mengetatkan sekatan ke atas aset digital. Perbendaharaan telah mengenakan sekatan ke atas alamat kripto, dan industri telah membelanjakan berjuta-juta untuk pematuhan untuk membuktikan ia bukan syurga bagi pelaku jahat. Tetapi jika Washington kini boleh menghalalkan bekas pejuang al-Qaeda sebagai ketua negara, tuntutan bahawa kripto unik berbahaya kerana ia mungkin digunakan oleh kumpulan militan kehilangan sedikit kuasanya. Logik yang sama yang meletakkan masa lalu keganasan di sisi dalam dasar luar harus digunakan untuk cara kripto dilayan." We need to be careful with "Treasury" - we can say "Perbendaharaan" (US Treasury). "sanctioned" -> "mengenakan sekatan". "haven" -> "syurga" (haven). "bad actors" -> "pelaku jahat". "punch" -> "kuasa" or "kesan". I used "kuasanya". Next heading: "Markets don't care — yet" -> "Pasaran tidak peduli — buat masa ini" or "US Strikes Syria From Terror List, Undercutting Crypto
