etc. Translate naturally.
Let's translate paragraph by paragraph.
Original: "A recent incident involving the Coldcard hardware wallet has cost users real money, and now a top executive at rival Trezor is weighing in with a familiar argument: hold your own keys."
Translation: "En nylig hendelse med Coldcard-maskinvarelommeboken har kostet brukere ekte penger, og nå kommer en toppleder hos konkurrenten Trezor med et kjent argument: hold dine egne nøkler."
But "maskinvarelommebok" is a common term for hardware wallet. "Kostet brukere ekte penger" - "real money" could be "virkelige penger" but "ekte penger" is fine. "Weighing in" -> "kommer med" or "blander seg inn". I'll use "kommer med".
Next: "Trezor's Chief Commercial Officer, Danny Sanders, published an article addressing the Coldcard incident. In it, he wrote that someone always holds your keys, and it should be you."
Translation: "Trezors Chief Commercial Officer, Danny Sanders, publiserte en artikkel som tar opp Coldcard-hendelsen. I den skrev han at noen alltid holder nøklene dine, og det bør være deg."
"Chief Commercial Officer" is a title, we can keep it in English or translate? Usually titles are kept in English, but we can say "kommersiell direktør" but it's common to keep the English title. I'll keep "Chief Commercial Officer" as is, but maybe "kommersiell direktør" is more Norwegian. However, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" but titles are not proper nouns. I'll translate to "kommersiell direktør" for naturalness. But "CCO" is often used. I'll use "kommersiell direktør" and then "Danny Sanders" as name.
So: "Trezors kommersielle direktør, Danny Sanders, publiserte en artikkel som tar opp Coldcard-hendelsen. I den skrev han at noen alltid holder nøklene dine, og det bør være deg."
Next:
The Coldcard Incident
->
Coldcard-hendelsen
Then: "Details about what exactly went wrong remain thin. What is known is that the incident resulted in financial losses for affected users. The event has prompted a response from Sanders, who used the moment to reinforce the case for self-custody."
Translation: "Detaljene om hva som gikk galt er fortsatt tynne. Det som er kjent, er at hendelsen førte til økonomiske tap for berørte brukere. Hendelsen har fått Sanders til å svare, og han brukte anledningen til å forsterke argumentet for selvforvaring."
"Reinforce the case" -> "forsterke argumentet" or "styrke saken". I'll use "forsterke argumentet for selvforvaring".
Next:
Sanders' Argument
->
Sanders' argument
(or "Sanders' argument" - in Norwegian, we often use "Sanders' argument" but it's fine. Actually, in Norwegian, we might write "Sanders' argument" or "Sanders sitt argument" but the possessive with apostrophe is common for names ending in s. I'll keep "Sanders' argument" as in original.
Then: "Sanders didn't mince words. His core message: if you don't control your private keys, you don't control your funds. He argued that users should take direct custody of their assets rather than leaving them on exchanges or with third parties. The article frames self-custody as the only way to truly own your crypto."
Translation: "Sanders la ikke skjul på hva han mente. Kjernebudskapet hans: hvis du ikke kontrollerer dine private nøkler, kontrollerer du ikke dine midler. Han argumenterte for at brukere bør ta direkte vare på sine eiendeler i stedet for å la dem ligge på børser eller hos tredjeparter. Artikkelen fremstiller selvforvaring som den eneste måten å virkelig eie kryptoen din på."
"Didn't mince words" -> "la ikke skjul på hva han mente" or "var ikke ordknapp" but the former is good. "Take direct custody" -> "ta direkte vare på" or "ha direkte kontroll over". I'll use "ta direkte vare på". "Crypto" -> "krypto" is common.
Next:
The Self-Custody Debate
->
Selvforvaringsdebatten
Then: "The Coldcard incident is a reminder that even hardware wallets come with risks. But Sanders' response shifts the focus to a broader principle: whoever holds the keys holds the money. The debate between self-custody and exchange custody has raged for years. Each approach has trade-offs. Exchanges offer convenience but require trusting a central party. Self-custody gives full control but puts the burden on the user to secure their keys."
Translation: "Coldcard-hendelsen er en påminnelse om at selv maskinvarelommebøker har risiko. Men Sanders' svar flytter fokuset til et bredere prinsipp: den som holder nøklene, holder pengene. Debatten mellom selvforvaring og børsforvaring har rast i årevis. Hver tilnærming har fordeler og ulemper. Børser tilbyr bekvemmelighet, men krever at man stoler på en sentral part. Selvforvaring gir full kontroll, men legger byrden på brukeren for å sikre nøklene sine."
"Exchange custody" -> "børsforvaring" is a bit awkward, maybe "oppbevaring på børs" but I'll use "børsforvaring" as a term. "Trade-offs" -> "avveininger" or "fordeler og ulemper". I'll use "fordeler og ulemper" for clarity.
Next: "Trezor, a manufacturer of hardware wallets, has a clear stake in this argument. Its products are designed to let users hold their own keys. Sanders' article reinforces that positioning. The incident, meanwhile, shows that no solution is foolproof, but the message from Trezor is consistent: the keys should be yours."
Translation: "Trezor, en produsent av maskinvarelommebøker, har en klar egeninteresse i dette argumentet. Produktene deres er designet for å la brukerne holde sine egne nøkler. Sanders' artikkel forsterker den posisjoneringen. Hendelsen viser samtidig at ingen løsning er idiotsikker, men budskapet fra Trezor er konsekvent: nøklene bør være dine."
"Clear stake" -> "klar egeninteresse" or "tydelig interesse". "Foolproof" -> "idiotsikker" is common, but maybe "feilfri" but "idiotsikker" is fine. "Reinforces"
