"
Then the paragraph: "Crypto markets have a way of ignoring everything that isn't a wallet address or a regulatory filing. That's not a bug; it's a feature. The value of Bitcoin and other digital assets is built on consensus and network effects, not on the physical world. A black hole's spin doesn't change the supply cap of Bitcoin, and exoskeletons don't alter the hash rate. So traders looked at the headlines, yawned, and went back to watching order books."
Norwegian: "Kryptomarkeder har en tendens til å ignorere alt som ikke er en lommebokadresse eller en regulatorisk innsending. Det er ikke en feil; det er en funksjon. Verdien av Bitcoin og andre digitale eiendeler er bygget på konsensus og nettverkseffekter, ikke på den fysiske verden. Et svart hulls spinn endrer ikke bitcoins tilbudstak, og eksoskjeletter endrer ikke hash-raten. Så tradere så på overskriftene, gjespet, og gikk tilbake til å se på ordrebøker."
We need to be careful: "supply cap" -> "tilbudstak" or "maksforsyning". "hash rate" -> "hash rate" is fine.
Then the next paragraph: "This indifference is worth noting. In an era where scientific progress can disrupt entire industries overnight, crypto's detachment from physical reality makes it a kind of safe haven — not from inflation or war, but from scientific uncertainty itself. If a discovery upends energy or computing, crypto's price won't care, because its value is rooted in agreement among users
