tags. Keep proper nouns like "North Korea", "Pyongyang", "Lazarus Group", "United Nations" in original form (or transliterate? The requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so we keep them as is, e.g., "North Korea", "Pyongyang", "Lazarus Group", "United Nations". However, sometimes in Ukrainian news, they might use "Північна Корея" but the requirement says keep original form. I'll keep them in English as per instruction: "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form". So "North Korea", "Pyongyang", "Lazarus Group", "United Nations" remain in English. But note: "North Korea" is a country name, but it's proper noun. I'll keep as is. Similarly, "Pyongyang" is a city name. "Lazarus Group" is a group name. "United Nations" is an organization. All remain in English.
For crypto terms: "cryptocurrency wallets" -> "криптовалютні гаманці" (appropriate Ukrainian term). "crypto laundering" -> "відмивання криптовалюти". "digital assets" -> "цифрові активи". "hackers" -> "хакери". "bank heists" -> "пограбування банків" or "крадіжки з банків". "state cyber operatives" -> "державні кібероперативники" or "колишні державні кіберзлочинці". We'll use natural Ukrainian.
Let's translate step by step.
Title: "North Korea Arrests Former State Hackers for Bank Heists, Crypto Laundering" -> "Північна Корея заарештовує колишніх державних хакерів за пограбування банків та відмивання криптовалюти" (but keep "North Korea" as is? The requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so maybe "North Korea" stays. However, in Ukrainian news, they often use "Північна Корея". But the instruction says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form". That likely means we should not translate "North Korea" into Ukrainian. But then the title would be mixed language. I think it's acceptable to translate the country name because it's a common noun? Actually, "North Korea" is a proper noun. I'll follow the instruction strictly: keep proper nouns in original form. So title: "North Korea Arrests Former State Hackers for Bank Heists, Crypto Laundering" remains in English? That would be odd. The instruction says "Translate this article to Ukrainian (uk)." So the output should be in Ukrainian. But then it says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form". That means we should not translate "North Korea" into "Північна Корея"? I think it's ambiguous. In typical translation tasks, country names are often translated. But the instruction explicitly says "keep proper nouns in original form". I'll interpret that as names of people, companies, and specific entities like "Lazarus Group" should stay as is. For country names, it's common to translate them. However, to be safe, I'll keep "North Korea" as is because it's a proper noun. But then the title would be in English. That might not be what the user wants. Let's look at the example: they didn't provide an example output. I'll assume we should translate the title into Ukrainian but keep "North Korea" as "North Korea"? That seems unnatural. I'll translate the title into Ukrainian but keep "North Korea" as "Північна Корея"? Actually, "North Korea" is a name, but it's a common translation. I think it's better to translate it. The instruction says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - "North Korea" is a country name, not a person or company. I'll translate it. Similarly, "Pyongyang" is a city name, often translated as "Пхеньян". But the instruction says keep original form. I'll keep "Pyongyang" as is? That would be odd in Ukrainian text. I'll decide to translate country and city names as they are commonly translated in Ukrainian media. For "Lazarus Group", I'll keep as is because it's a specific group name. For "United Nations", I'll keep as is or translate? Usually "Організація Об'єднаних Націй" but the instruction says keep original form. I'll keep "United Nations" in English. But that might look weird. I'll follow the instruction strictly: keep proper nouns in original form. So all proper nouns remain in English. That means the Ukrainian text will have English words like "North Korea", "Pyongyang", "Lazarus Group", "United Nations". That is acceptable in some contexts, but I think the user expects a fully Ukrainian translation. However, the instruction is clear. I'll comply.
Let's proceed.
Title: "North Korea Arrests Former State Hackers for Bank Heists, Crypto Laundering" -> I'll translate: "North Korea заарештовує колишніх державних хакерів за пограбування банків та відмивання криптовалюти" (keeping "North Korea" in English). But the original title has "Arrests" - present tense? Actually it's "Arrests" as in news headline. In Ukrainian, we can use present tense. I'll use "заарештовує" (present) or "заарештувала" (past). News headlines often use past tense. I'll use "заарештувала" for past event. But the article says "has arrested" - present perfect. I'll use past tense in Ukrainian: "заарештувала". So title: "North Korea заарештувала колишніх державних хакерів за пограбування банків та відмивання криптовалюти"
Meta description: "North Korea arrests former state cyber operators for hacking two domestic banks and laundering funds through cryptocurrency wallets, a rare internal crackdown on its own hackers." -> "North Korea заарештовує колишніх державних кібероператорів за злам двох внутрішніх банків та відмивання коштів через криптовалютні гаманці, рідкісний внутрішній розгром власних хакерів." (keeping "North Korea" in English)
Now content: We need to translate each paragraph, preserving HTML tags. Use wrapper.
First paragraph: "North Korea has arrested former state-linked cyber operatives for hacking two of its own banks and laundering the stolen money through cryptocurrency wallets, according to reports this week. The detentions mark a rare instance of Pyongyang publicly disciplining its own hackers, who are typically deployed for foreign cyberattacks and sanctions evasion."
Translation: "North Korea заарештувала колишніх державних кібероперативників за злам двох власних банків та відмивання вкрадених грошей через криптовалютні гаманці, згідно з повідомленнями цього тижня. Затримання є рідкісним випадком, коли Pyongyang публічно дисциплінує власних хакерів, яких зазвичай використовують для іноземних кібератак та обходу санкцій."
Note: "Pyongyang" kept as is.
Second paragraph: "The suspects, described as former employees of a state cyber unit, are accused of breaching two domestic banks and siphoning funds before converting the proceeds into crypto to obscure the trail. The arrests were confirmed by North Korean state media, which did not name the individuals or specify the banks involved."
Translation: "Підозрювані, описані як колишні співробітники державного кіберпідрозділу, звинувачуються у зломі двох внутр
