etc. Let's translate paragraph by paragraph. Original:
Bitcoin's BIP-110 fork ground to a halt this week after producing just two blocks. The breakaway chain inherited Bitcoin's mining difficulty, but only a tiny share of hashpower is actually mining it, leaving blocks hours apart while both chains still accept the same transactions.
Translation:Bitcoins BIP-110-fork gik i stå denne uge efter kun at have produceret to blokke. Den udbryderkæde arvede Bitcoins minedriftsvanskelighed, men kun en lille del af hashkraften miner faktisk på den, hvilket efterlader blokke med timer imellem, mens begge kæder stadig accepterer de samme transaktioner.
Note: "Bitcoin's" -> "Bitcoins" (possessive), "fork" -> "fork" (same), "ground to a halt" -> "gik i stå", "breakaway chain" -> "udbryderkæde", "inherited" -> "arvede", "mining difficulty" -> "minedriftsvanskelighed" or "minedriftssværhedsgrad"? We'll use "minedriftsvanskelighed" but maybe "minedriftssværhedsgrad" is more common. Actually "difficulty" in crypto is often "sværhedsgrad". So "Bitcoins minedriftssværhedsgrad" or "Bitcoins sværhedsgrad for minedrift". I'll use "Bitcoins minedriftssværhedsgrad" but it's a bit long. Alternatively, "arvede Bitcoins minedriftsvanskelighed" – but "vanskelighed" is more like "difficulty" in general. In crypto, it's "sværhedsgrad". So I'll say "arvede Bitcoins sværhedsgrad for minedrift" but that's clunky. Let's just say "arvede Bitcoins minedriftssværhedsgrad" – that is a compound noun. Or "arvede Bitcoins sværhedsgrad for minedrift" – I think "minedriftssværhedsgrad" is fine. Also "hashpower" is often kept as "hashpower" or "hashkraft". I'll use "hashkraft" as it's common in Danish crypto context. "leaving blocks hours apart" -> "hvilket efterlader blokke med timer imellem" – that's fine. "while both chains still accept the same transactions" -> "mens begge kæder stadig accepterer de samme transaktioner." Next:Two blocks, then nothing
->To blokke, og så intet
or "To blokke, derefter intet" – I'll use "To blokke, og så intet" but "derefter" is more formal. Let's use "To blokke, derefter intet". Then:Block explorers show the fork stopped after its second block. No new blocks have been found since, and at the current pace, the network is effectively frozen. The chain hasn't died outright, but it's not moving either.
Translation:Block-udforskere viser, at forken stoppede efter sin anden blok. Ingen nye blokke er fundet siden, og ved den nuværende hastighed er netværket reelt frosset. Kæden er ikke død direkte, men den bevæger sig heller ikke.
Note: "Block explorers" -> "Block-udforskere" or "blok-udforskere"? Usually "block explorer" is "blok-udforsker" or "block explorer" is often kept in English. But we can translate as "blok-udforskere". I'll use "Blok-udforskere". "the fork stopped after its second block" -> "forken stoppede efter sin anden blok". "No new blocks have been found since" -> "Ingen nye blokke er fundet siden". "at the current pace" -> "ved den nuværende hastighed" or "i det nuværende tempo". "effectively frozen" -> "reelt frosset". "The chain hasn't died outright" -> "Kæden er ikke død direkte" – but "outright" means "helt" or "fuldstændigt". So "Kæden er ikke død helt" – but "outright" implies "completely". I'll say "Kæden er ikke død fuldstændigt" but "direkte" might be okay. Actually "outright" means "completely" so "Kæden er ikke død helt" – but we can say "Kæden er ikke død uden videre" – no, that means "without further ado". Better: "Kæden er ikke død helt" – but "død" is adjective, so "er ikke død" is fine. "but it's not moving either" -> "men den bevæger sig heller ikke." Next:The difficulty problem
->Sværhedsgradsproblemet
or "Problemet med sværhedsgraden" – I'll use "Sværhedsgradsproblemet" as a compound. Then:The core issue is simple math. BIP-110 forked off Bitcoin without adjusting the difficulty target. That means miners on the new chain need the same massive amount of work to find a block as they do on Bitcoin proper, but they're doing it with a fraction of the network's total computing power.
Translation:Kerneproblemet er simpel matematik. BIP-110 forked fra Bitcoin uden at justere sværhedsgradsmålet. Det betyder, at minearbejdere på den nye kæde har brug for den samme enorme mængde arbejde for at finde en blok, som de har på selve Bitcoin, men de gør det med en brøkdel af netværkets samlede regnekraft.
Note: "simple math" -> "simpel matematik". "forked off" -> "forked fra" – we can use "forkede" but "forked" is a verb, we can say "BIP-110 forked fra Bitcoin" – but in Danish we might say "BIP-110 forgrenede sig fra Bitcoin" but "fork" is used as a noun and verb in crypto context. I'll keep "forked" as "forkede" but it's not a Danish verb. Actually we can say "BIP-110 lavede en fork fra Bitcoin" but that's awkward. Better: "BIP-110 forked fra Bitcoin" – many Danes use "fork" as a verb. I'll use "forkede" but that might be too Danish. I'll write "BIP-110 forked fra Bitcoin" – but to be safe, I'll use "BIP-110 lavede en fork fra Bitcoin" – but that changes structure. Let's think: "BIP-110 forked off Bitcoin" means it created a fork from Bitcoin. In Danish, we might say "BIP-110 forked fra Bitcoin" – I think it's acceptable. Alternatively, "BIP-110 udsprang fra Bitcoin" but that's not precise. I'll use "BIP
