" or "Hvorfor kvanteteknologi er bekymringen"? We'll use "Hvorfor kvante er bekymringen" but maybe "Hvorfor kvantetruslen er bekymringen"? Let's keep simple: "Hvorfor kvante er bekymringen".
Paragraph: "The math behind today's signatures could crack once quantum computers get big enough. No one knows when that happens, but the stakes are enormous — 37 million ETH, worth billions, all resting on a digital signature that a future machine might unravel. Researchers want to get ahead of that, not wait for the first breach."
Danish: "Matematikken bag nutidens signaturer kan knække, når kvantecomputere bliver store nok. Ingen ved, hvornår det sker, men indsatsen er enorm — 37 millioner ETH, værd milliarder, alt sammen hvilende på en digital signatur, som en fremtidig maskine måske kan afsløre. Forskerne vil komme i forkøbet, ikke vente på det første brud."
We'll use "knække" for "crack", "indsatsen" for "stakes" (but "stakes" here means the amount at risk, so "indsatsen" works). "afsløre" for "unravel" - maybe "opklare" or "knække"? Actually "unravel" means to figure out, so "afsløre" is okay. "komme i forkøbet" for "get ahead of that". "brud" for "breach".
Next: "This isn't a panic response. It's a slow, deliberate shift. The proposal targets a full migration to leanXMSS, a scheme built to survive quantum attacks. That's not a small swap; it touches the very contract that locks in validators' deposits."
Danish: "Dette er ikke en panikreaktion. Det er en langsom, bevidst ændring. Forslaget sigter mod en fuld migrering til leanXMSS, en ordning bygget til at overleve kvanteangreb. Det er ikke en lille udskiftning; det berører selve kontrakten, der låser validatorernes indskud fast."
We'll use "panikreaktion" for "panic response", "bevidst ændring" for "deliberate shift", "migrering" for "migration", "ordning" for "scheme", "kvanteangreb" for "quantum attacks", "udskiftning" for "swap", "berører" for "touches", "låser ... fast" for "locks in".
Next: "
How the new contract works
" -> "
Sådan fungerer den nye kontrakt
"
Paragraph: "The deposit contract is the front door for anyone who wants to stake. Right now it accepts signatures from validators using the standard set. The proposed upgrade would add a post-quantum path, so new deposits could be signed with leanXMSS from the start. Over time, as the network moves, the old signatures would fade out."
Danish: "Deposit-kontrakten er hoveddøren for alle, der ønsker at stake. Lige nu accepterer den signaturer fra validatorer, der bruger standardsættet. Den foreslåede opgradering vil tilføje en post-kvante sti, så nye indskud kan underskrives med leanXMSS fra starten. Over tid, efterhånden som netværket bevæger sig, vil de gamle signaturer forsvinde."
We'll use "hoveddøren" for "front door", "stake" as verb (common in Danish crypto), "standardsættet" for "standard set", "sti" for "path", "underskrives" for "signed", "forsvinde" for "fade out".
Next: "LeanXMSS has a reputation for being heavy on the math but light on assumptions — no fancy traps, just a solid construction that's been studied for years. That's what researchers seem to want here: something durable, not a shortcut."
Danish: "LeanXMSS har et ry for at være tung på matematikken, men let på antagelser — ingen smarte fælder, bare en solid konstruktion, der har været studeret i årevis. Det er, hvad forskerne ser ud til at ønske her: noget holdbart, ikke en genvej."
We'll use "tung på matematikken" for "heavy on the math", "let på antagelser" for "light on assumptions", "smarte fælder" for "fancy traps", "solid konstruktion" for "solid construction", "holdbart" for "durable", "genvej" for "shortcut".
Next: "
Protecting 37 million staked ETH
" -> "
Beskyttelse af 37 millioner indsatte ETH
" or "Beskyttelse af 37 millioner stakede ETH"? We'll use "indsatte" for "staked" as adjective.
Paragraph: "The number in play is staggering. 37 million ETH sits locked in the staking contract, a chunk of the total supply that can't just be moved if a threat appears. If a quantum machine could forge a validator's signature, the whole stake could be at risk. The new contract doesn't fix that overnight — it's a plan, not a patch."
Danish: "Tallet i spil er svimlende. 37 millioner ETH ligger låst i staking-kontrakten, en del af den samlede forsyning, der ikke bare kan flyttes, hvis en trussel opstår. Hvis en kvant
