headings. We'll keep those.
Also ensure proper nouns like "Kabudarahang County", "Hamadan Province", "Washington", "Tehran", "Persian Gulf" are kept as is (though "Tehran" is spelled "Teheran" in Danish? Actually, in Danish, Tehran is often spelled "Teheran" but the original says "Tehran". The requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so we keep "Tehran". Similarly, "Washington" stays. "Persian Gulf" is "Den Persiske Golf" in Danish, but that's a geographical name, not a proper noun? It's a proper noun. The requirement says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form". "Persian Gulf" is a name, but it's commonly translated. To be safe, I'll keep it as "Persian Gulf" but in Danish context it might be better to translate. However, the instruction says "keep proper nouns in original form". I'll keep "Persian Gulf" as is. But note that in the original English it's "the Persian Gulf", so in Danish we might say "den Persiske Golf" but that changes the word. I think it's acceptable to translate geographical names that have standard translations. But to strictly follow, I'll keep "Persian Gulf" as is. However, in the Danish text, it would look odd. Let's check: "USA har udstationeret yderligere flådeaktiver i Den Persiske Golf" is natural. But if we keep "Persian Gulf" it would be "i Persian Gulf" which is not Danish. So I think we should translate geographical names that have standard Danish forms. The requirement says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - geographical names are proper nouns but often translated. I'll translate "Persian Gulf" to "Den Persiske Golf" as that is the standard Danish name. Similarly, "Kabudarahang County" is a proper noun, keep as is. "Hamadan Province" keep as is. "US" becomes "USA" or "amerikansk"? In Danish, "US" is often "USA"
