. Let's translate:
First paragraph: "A federal appeals court has revived a shareholder lawsuit against Signature Bank, rejecting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's attempt to block the case. The ruling could set a precedent for how investors pursue claims after bank failures."
Translation: "Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha reavivado una demanda de accionistas contra Signature Bank, rechazando el intento de la Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos (FDIC) de bloquear el caso. El fallo podría sentar un precedente sobre cómo los inversores buscan reclamaciones después de quiebras bancarias."
Note: "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" is often left as FDIC in Spanish, but we can translate the full name. However, the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form. But "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" is a proper noun? It's the name of the agency. Usually we keep acronym FDIC. But in the article it says "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" in the first paragraph. We can translate as "Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos" but then we might use FDIC. To be safe, we can keep "FDIC" as is, and perhaps mention the full name in Spanish? But the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" so we should keep "Signature Bank" and "FDIC" as is. Also "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" is a proper noun, but we might translate it? Actually, in Spanish media, they often say "FDIC" or "Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos". But to be consistent, we can keep "FDIC" and maybe add the translation in parentheses? The instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so I'll keep "FDIC" as is. However, the original text says "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" - that is a proper noun, so we should keep it as is? But it's English. The translation should be in Spanish, so we need to decide. Usually, we translate the name of agencies if they have a Spanish equivalent, but it's a proper noun. I think we can keep "FDIC" as is, but the full name is not necessary. In the article, it's used as "the FDIC" later. So in the first paragraph, we can say "la FDIC" or "la Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos (FDIC)". But the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" – that includes "Signature Bank" and "FDIC" (since it's an acronym). So we can just use "FDIC". But the full name appears in the original, so we might translate it? Actually, the original says "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" - that is a proper noun, but it's a name. In Spanish, we often translate it as "Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos". However, the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so I'll keep it as "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" but that would be English in a Spanish text. That might be awkward. Better to use "FDIC" and maybe add the full name in Spanish? But the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we keep "Signature Bank" and "FDIC" as is. The full name "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation" is also a proper noun, but it's the full name. In Spanish, it's common to use the acronym. I'll translate the sentence but keep the name as "FDIC" and maybe expand it? Actually, the original says "the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's attempt" - we can say "el intento de la FDIC" or "el intento de la Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos (FDIC)". But to be safe, I'll use "FDIC" since it's recognized. The instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so "FDIC" is the acronym, it's fine. I'll just use "FDIC" and not translate the full name. So first paragraph: "Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha reavivado una demanda de accionistas contra Signature Bank, rechazando el intento de la FDIC de bloquear el caso. El fallo podría sentar un precedente sobre cómo los inversores persiguen reclamaciones después de quiebras bancarias."
But "pursue claims" could be "presentan reclamaciones" or "buscan reclamaciones". I'll use "buscan reclamaciones" or "presentan demandas". Actually, "pursue claims" means to seek legal claims, so "buscar reclamaciones" is okay. But "reclamaciones" might be too generic. Maybe "presentar demandas" but it's not exactly. I'll use "buscar reclamaciones" or "buscar compensación". Let's see.
Second paragraph: "Why the FDIC objected" -> "Por qué la FDIC se opuso" or "Por qué la FDIC objetó". The heading:
Why the FDIC objected
->
Por qué la FDIC se opuso
Then content: "The FDIC, which stepped in as receiver when Signature Bank collapsed, had objected to the lawsuit. The appeals court overruled that objection, allowing the case to move forward. The court's decision didn't spell out every detail of the FDIC's argument, but it found the shareholders' claims strong enough to proceed."
Translation: "La FDIC, que intervino como receptora cuando Signature Bank colapsó, había objetado la demanda. El tribunal de apelaciones anuló esa objeción, permitiendo que el caso avanzara. La decisión del tribunal no detalló cada argumento de la FDIC, pero consideró que las reclamaciones de los accionistas eran lo suficientemente sólidas como para continuar."
Note: "stepped in as receiver" - "intervino como receptora" (receiver in banking context is "síndico" or "administrador judicial"? But "receiver" is often "síndico" or "liquidator". In FDIC context, it's "receptor" but we can use "síndico" or "administrador". Actually, in Spanish, the FDIC is "Corporación Federal de Seguro de Depósitos" and its role as receiver is "síndico" or "liquidador". But to keep it simple, I'll say "actuó como receptora" or "intervino como administradora". But "receiver" is a legal term. I'll use "receptora" as it's understood. Or "fideicomisaria"? Better to say "intervino como síndico" but "síndico" is more common. Let's check: In Spanish, for failed banks, the FDIC acts as "receiver" which is "síndico" or "liquidador". I'll use "síndico" but since FDIC is a corporation, maybe "síndica" is feminine? Actually, "síndico" is masculine, but we can say "actuó como síndico". But to avoid confusion, I'll say "actuó como receptora" - but that might be a literal translation. I think "intervino como liquidadora" is also possible. Let's use "intervino como administradora" but that's not exact. I'll use "intervino como síndico" - but the FDIC is a corporation, so "síndico" is fine. However, in many Spanish-language financial news, they say "receptor" or "síndico". I'll use "receptora" because it's a direct translation and understandable.
