The 60-vote math
->60표의 수학
but that's literal. Better:60표 확보의 계산
or60표의 정치적 계산
I'll use60표 확보의 계산
Then:Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate, so at least seven Democrats would have to join the effort. Democrats have so far been hesitant, pushing for extra ethics provisions that govern politicians' crypto holdings — a point that sharpened after Trump's substantial crypto profits were disclosed. Banking groups also want stronger stablecoin protections, saying the current language doesn't go far enough to shield their industry.
Translation:공화당은 상원에서 53석을 차지하고 있으므로, 최소 7명의 민주당 의원이 동참해야 한다. 민주당은 지금까지 주저하며 정치인들의 암호화폐 보유를 규제하는 추가 윤리 조항을 요구해 왔다. 이는 트럼프의 상당한 암호화폐 수익이 공개된 이후 더욱 부각된 사안이다. 은행권도 더 강력한 스테이블코인 보호 조치를 원하며, 현재 문구가 그들의 업계를 보호하기에 충분하지 않다고 주장하고 있다.
We need to keep "Trump" as is. "stablecoin" -> "스테이블코인" is fine. Third paragraph:Why Armstrong is optimistic
->암스트롱이 낙관하는 이유
Armstrong argues the bill has "a great chance of passing" and that it already gives "90% of what they want on both sides." He also points to the fact that Senate Majority Leader John Thune scheduled the vote — something he wouldn't do if he thought it would fail. If it doesn't pass, Armstrong says he commends the CFTC and SEC chairs for "pushing forward with clear rules regardless."
Translation:암스트롱은 이 법안이 "통
