Loading market data...

Coldcard Mk3 Users Warned of $38M Bitcoin Vulnerability

Coldcard Mk3 Users Warned of $38M Bitcoin Vulnerability

and

. We'll translate each part. First paragraph: "Coinkite issued a security advisory Thursday warning owners of its Coldcard Mk3 hardware wallet that funds tied to certain firmware versions may be at risk. Reports indicate a $38 million Bitcoin loss associated with the vulnerability. The warning comes after long-dormant addresses began moving in a tightly coordinated pattern on July 30, prompting scrutiny from blockchain analysts." Translation: "Coinkite utstedte en sikkerhetsadvarsel torsdag, og advarte eiere av sin Coldcard Mk3 hardware-lommebok om at midler knyttet til bestemte firmware-versjoner kan være i fare. Rapporter indikerer et tap på 38 millioner dollar i Bitcoin knyttet til sårbarheten. Advarselen kommer etter at lenge sovende adresser begynte å bevege seg i et tett koordinert mønster den 30. juli, noe som utløste gransking fra blockchain-analytikere." Note: "hardware wallet" -> "hardware-lommebok" (or "maskinvarelommebok"? but "hardware-lommebok" is common). "firmware" -> "fastvare" but often "firmware" is used. I'll use "fastvare" for consistency, but "firmware" is also understood. Let's use "fastvare" as it's the Norwegian term. "blockchain" -> "blokkjede" but often "blockchain" is used. I'll use "blokkjede" to be natural. Actually, in Norwegian crypto context, "blokkjede" is common. I'll use that. Second paragraph: "What the advisory says" -> "Hva advarselen sier" or "Hva rådgivningen sier" but "advisory" here is a security advisory, so "sikkerhetsadvarsel" is used. But the heading is "What the advisory says" – we can translate as "Hva advarselen sier". Content: "Coinkite's advisory, published Thursday, specifically flags the Mk3 model. The company urged users to check their firmware version and take immediate steps to secure funds. The exact firmware versions affected weren't detailed in the advisory, but the company said it's working on a fix. For now, the priority is preventing further losses." Translation: "Coinkites advarsel, publisert torsdag, peker spesifikt på Mk3-modellen. Selskapet oppfordret brukere til å sjekke fastvareversjonen og ta umiddelbare skritt for å sikre midler. De nøyaktige fastvareversjonene som er berørt, ble ikke detaljert i advarselen, men selskapet sa at de jobber med en løsning. Foreløpig er prioriteten å forhindre ytterligere tap." Third paragraph: "The $38 million movement" -> "Bevegelsen på 38 millioner dollar" or "Bevegelsen av 38 millioner dollar" but better: "Bevegelsen på 38 millioner dollar". Content: "On July 30, a cluster of long-dormant Bitcoin addresses began transferring funds in a coordinated manner. The pattern raised alarms among blockchain analysts, who traced the activity back to wallets associated with the Coldcard Mk3 vulnerability. The total moved so far is estimated at $38 million. That's a significant sum for a hardware wallet exploit — and the coordinated timing suggests the attacker had been planning the move for a while." Translation: "Den 30. juli begynte en klynge av lenge sovende Bitcoin-adresser å overføre midler på en koordinert måte. Mønsteret vekket bekymring blant blokkjede-analytikere, som sporet aktiviteten tilbake til lommebøker knyttet til Coldcard Mk3-sårbarheten. Det totale beløpet som er flyttet så langt, er estimert til 38 millioner dollar. Det er en betydelig sum for et hardware-lommebok-utnyttelse – og den koordinerte timingen tyder på at angriperen hadde planlagt flyttingen en stund." Note: "hardware wallet exploit" -> "hardware-lommebok-utnyttelse" but maybe "utnyttelse av hardware-lommebok" is more natural. I'll use "utnyttelse av hardware-lommebok" but we need to keep it concise. Actually, "exploit" can be "sårbarhetsutnyttelse" or "utnyttelse". I'll use "utnyttelse av hardware-lommebok" but that's a bit long. Alternatively, "et angrep på hardware-lommebok" but it's an exploit. I'll go with "utnyttelse av hardware-lommebok" but in the context, it's fine. Fourth paragraph: "What users should do now" -> "Hva brukere bør gjøre nå" Content: "Coinkite recommends that Mk3 owners move their funds to a different wallet or upgrade to a newer hardware model if possible. The company said it will release a detailed post-mortem once the investigation is complete. No timeline has been given for that report, but the clock is ticking for Mk3 users still holding funds on the affected firmware. The exchange hasn't said whether it will offer compensation, and that question remains open." Translation: "Coinkite anbefaler at Mk3-eiere flytter midlene sine til en annen lommebok eller oppgraderer til en nyere hardware-modell hvis mulig. Selskapet sa at de vil publisere en detaljert post-mortem når undersøkelsen er fullført. Ingen tidslinje er gitt for den rapporten, men tiden renner ut for Mk3-brukere som fortsatt har midler på den berørte fastvaren. Børsen har ikke sagt om de vil tilby kompensasjon, og det spørsmålet forblir åpent." Note: "exchange" – here it says "The exchange hasn't said..." but Coinkite is not an exchange; it's a hardware wallet company. The original says "The exchange" – maybe they meant "The company"? Actually, the original says "The exchange hasn't said whether it will offer compensation" – but Coinkite is not an exchange. Possibly a mistake, but we should translate as "Børsen" if it's exchange, but that would be weird. Actually, the original says "The exchange" – but in the context, it's Coinkite. Maybe they meant "The company". But we must translate faithfully. The original says "The exchange" – but that might be an error. We could translate as "Selskapet" (the company) to make sense, but we should stick to the original. However, the original says "The exchange hasn't said whether it will offer compensation" – but Coinkite is not an exchange. Possibly they meant "The company" but wrote "exchange" by mistake. I'll translate as "Selskapet" to be natural, but we need to be faithful. Let's check: The original article says "The exchange hasn't said whether it will offer compensation" – but earlier they talk about Coinkite. So it's likely a typo. I'll translate as "Selskapet" (the company) to avoid confusion. But the instruction says "Maintain the exact meaning" – so if they wrote "exchange", we should translate "exchange" as "børs". But that would be inaccurate. I think it's safer to translate as "Selskapet" because it's clearly referring to Coinkite. However, we must be faithful. Let's see: In the original, the last sentence: "The exchange hasn't said whether it will offer compensation, and that question remains open." It might be a mistake, but we'll translate as "Børsen" if we are literal. But in Norwegian, "børs" means stock exchange or crypto exchange. Coinkite is not an exchange. So it would be confusing. I'll translate as "S