,
. We'll translate the text. Important: Keep proper nouns like BitMart in original. We'll translate the entire content as provided, including the incomplete last sentence. But we can make it complete by adding a period? Actually, the original says: "the exchange has to" and then the article ends. That's not a complete sentence. We might need to complete it based on context. But we should not invent. Perhaps the original article was longer, but we only have this. We'll translate it as is, but it might look odd. Alternatively, we can assume the article continues and we can add a sentence to complete it, but that would be inventing. Better to translate exactly what's given. The user might have provided the full article but it got cut off in the message. Let's check the user's message: They wrote "ORIGINAL CONTENT:" and then the article. It ends with "the exchange has to" and then the article tag. That is likely a truncation. We'll translate the given text and we'll make it complete by adding a period and maybe a closing sentence? But we should not add content. Since the instruction is to translate, we'll translate the given text and if it's incomplete, we'll leave it as is. However, the article in the prompt is actually longer? Let's look at the user's message: They provided the full article in the "ORIGINAL CONTENT" field, but it ends with "the exchange has to" and then the article tag. Actually, I see that the article text in the user message is cut off because they wrote "the exchange has to" and then the article closes. But in the initial part of the user message, they included the full article? Wait, the user message includes the original content in the "ORIGINAL CONTENT" field, and it ends with "
