Amazon is backing a 7.65 gigawatt natural gas power plant in West Texas to feed an AI data center, marking a major bet on off-grid electricity. The project, part of the company's strategy to secure dedicated power for its cloud computing expansion, is drawing fire over its carbon footprint and the broader energy policy questions it raises.
Translation:亚马逊正在支持西得克萨斯一座7.65吉瓦的天然气发电厂，为AI数据中心供电，这标志着对离网电力的重大押注。该项目是该公司为其云计算扩展确保专用电力战略的一部分，正因其碳足迹和引发的更广泛能源政策问题而受到批评。
We need to be careful with "drawing fire" -> "受到批评" or "招致批评". Also "off-grid electricity" -> "离网电力". Next:The Off-Grid Power Play
->离网电力布局
or "离网电力策略". We'll use "离网电力布局". Then:The plant is designed to run independently of the main Texas grid, a move that gives Amazon control over its power supply but also sidesteps the state's deregulated market. For a data center operator, that reliability is valuable — AI workloads don't tolerate downtime, and natural gas can ramp up quickly when demand spikes.
Translation:该电厂设计为独立于得克萨斯主电网运行，此举让亚马逊能够控制其电力供应，但也绕过了该州的放松管制市场。对于数据中心运营商来说，这种可靠性很有价值——AI工作负载不能容忍停机，而天然气可以在需求高峰时快速提升发电量。
Next:Amazon hasn't said when construction starts or when the plant would come online. What's clear is that this isn't a small backup generator. At 7.65 GW, the facility would be one of the largest gas plants in the country, roughly the size of several nuclear reactors.
Translation:亚马逊尚未透露何时开工或电厂何时投运。明确的是，这不是一个小型备用发电机。7.65吉瓦的规模将使该设施成为全国最大的天然气电厂之一，大约相当于几座核反应堆的规模。
Next:Why Gas, Not Renewables
->为什么选择天然气而非可再生能源
Then:The choice of natural gas over solar or wind is telling. Renewables are intermittent — the sun doesn't always shine, and the wind doesn't always blow. For a data center that needs 24/7 power, pairing batteries with renewables is possible but expensive at this scale. Gas is cheaper upfront and can run around the clock.
Translation:选择天然气而非太阳能或风能很能说明问题。可再生能源具有间歇性——太阳不总是照耀，风不总是吹。对于需要24/7电力的数据中心，将电池与可再生能源结合是可能的，但在这种规模下成本高昂。天然气前期成本更低，且可以全天候运行。
Next:That practical logic doesn't erase the environmental cost. Burning gas releases carbon dioxide, and a plant this size would emit millions of tons annually. Amazon has pledged to reach net-zero carbon by 2040, and this project cuts against that goal in a visible way.
Translation:这种务实逻辑并不能消除环境成本。燃烧天然气会释放二氧化碳，如此规模的电厂每年将排放数百万吨。亚马逊承诺到2040年实现净零碳排放，而该项目明显违背了这一目标。
Next:Carbon Concerns and Policy Ripple
->碳担忧与政策涟漪
Then:Environmental groups are likely to point to this as evidence that the AI boom is locking in fossil fuel dependence. The plant also raises questions about energy policy: if a major company can build its own gas-fired infrastructure, what does that mean for state and federal climate targets? West Texas is already a hub for oil and gas, and this project would deepen that reliance.
Translation:环保组织很可能会指出，这证明了AI热潮正在锁定对化石燃料的依赖。该电厂还引发了能源政策问题：如果一家大公司可以自建燃气基础设施，这对州和联邦气候目标意味着什么？西得克萨斯已经是石油和天然气中心，该项目将加深这种依赖。
Next:There's also the question of grid fairness. Off-grid plants don't pay into the transmission system, yet they still draw on shared resources like water for cooling. Regulators haven't weighed in publicly, and no permits have been announced in the facts.
Translation:还有电网公平性问题。离网电厂不向输电系统付费，但仍会消耗冷却水等共享资源。监管机构尚未公开表态，事实上也没有宣布任何许可证。
Next:Amazon's move reflects a broader trend among tech companies racing to secure power for AI data centers. But this one is bigger than most, and it puts the company's climate promises under a harsh spotlight.
Translation:亚马逊此举反映了科技公司竞相为AI数据中心确保电力的更广泛趋势。但这一项目比大多数都大，并将公司的气候承诺置于严苛的聚光灯下。
Now we need to combine into the article HTML. We'll keep the tags exactly as in original, just replace the text. So content will be:...
...
