tags. Use Danish terms: "krypto" for crypto, "projekter" for projects, "shutdown" -> "lukket ned", "shakeout" -> "udrensning" or "oprydning", "dot-com" is often kept as "dot-com" in Danish, "DeFi" is used as is, "NFT" as is, "airdrop" as is, "whitepaper" as is, "cash flow" -> "pengestrøm" or "likviditet", "revenue" -> "omsætning" or "indtægter", "users" -> "brugere", "protocols" -> "protokoller", "tokens" -> "tokens" (often used in Danish), "startups" -> "startups" (or "iværksættervirksomheder" but "startups" is common), "hype" -> "hype", "speculation" -> "spekulation", "proof of life" -> "bevis på liv" but better "bevis for overlevelse" or "livstegn". We'll aim for natural Danish.
Meta description: Translate similarly.
Let's do it step by step.
Title: "Over 100 kryptoprojekter lukker i 2026, mens udrensningen omformer branchen" - but "Fold" could be "går ned" or "lukker". "Shakeout" -> "udrensning" is good. "Reshapes" -> "omformer" or "ændrer". I'll use "omformer".
Content translation:
First paragraph: "More than 100 crypto projects have shut down so far in 2026, a dot-com style shakeout that is clearing out the industry's weakest players. The purge is leaving behind a smaller field of protocols that can point to actual revenue and real users — not just promises."
Danish: "Mere end 100 kryptoprojekter er lukket ned indtil videre i 2026, en dot-com-lignende udrensning, der rydder ud i branchens svageste aktører. Udrensningen efterlader et mindre felt af protokoller, der kan pege på faktiske indtægter og rigtige brugere – ikke kun løfter."
Second paragraph: "A brutal year for crypto startups" -> "Et brutalt år for krypto-startups" or "Et hårdt år for krypto-startups". I'll use "Et brutalt år for krypto-startups".
Text: "The scale of the collapse is hard to ignore. Over 100 projects have folded in roughly seven months, a pace that mirrors the dot-com bust of the early 2000s. Many of these were startups that raised money on hype, launched tokens, and never found a way to make money. Some had big names behind them. Most didn't."
Danish: "Omfanget af kollapset er svært at ignorere. Over 100 projekter er gået ned på cirka syv måneder, et tempo, der spejler dot-com-krakket i starten af 2000'erne. Mange af disse var startups, der rejste penge på hype, lancerede tokens og aldrig fandt en måde at tjene penge på. Nogle havde store navne bag sig. De fleste havde ikke."
Third paragraph: "The list of casualties cuts across every corner of the industry — DeFi apps, NFT platforms, gaming projects, infrastructure plays. A few were outright scams, but most were simply businesses that couldn't sustain themselves once the easy money dried up."
Danish: "Listen over ofre spænder over alle hjørner af branchen – DeFi-apps, NFT-platforme, spilprojekter, infrastruktursatsninger. Et par stykker var rene svindelnumre, men de fleste var simpelthen virksomheder, der ikke kunne opretholde sig selv, da de lette penge tørrede ud."
Fourth paragraph: "Cash flow is the new proof of life" -> "Pengestrøm er det nye bevis på liv" or "Likviditet er det nye livstegn". I'll use "Pengestrøm er det nye livstegn" - but "proof of life" is a term, maybe "bevis for liv" but better "livstegn". Actually "proof of life" in context means evidence that they are alive/viable. So "Pengestrøm er det nye bevis på overlevelse" or "Likviditet er det nye bevis på liv". I'll go with "Pengestrøm er det nye bevis på liv" but "liv" is fine.
Text: "The survivors share a few traits. They have real cash flow — fees, subscriptions, or other recurring revenue that doesn't depend on token prices going up. They also have actual users who come back, not just airdrop farmers or bots. That might sound basic, but in a market where many projects were built on speculation, it's a differentiator."
Danish: "Overleverne deler et par træk. De har en reel pengestrøm – gebyrer, abonnementer eller andre tilbagevendende indtægter, der ikke afhænger af, at token-priserne stiger. De har også faktiske brugere, der vender tilbage, ikke kun airdrop-landbrugere eller bots. Det lyder måske basalt, men i et marked, hvor mange projekter blev bygget på spekulation, er det en differentiator."
Fifth paragraph: "One thing is clear: the days of a whitepaper and a community are over. Investors and users are demanding proof that a protocol solves a problem people will pay for."
Danish: "En ting er klar: dagene med en whitepaper og et fællesskab er forbi. Investorer og brugere kræver bevis for, at en protokol løser et problem, folk vil betale for."
Sixth paragraph: "The dot-com echo" -> "Dot-com-ekkoet" or "Ekkoet fra dot-com". I'll use "Dot-com-ekkoet".
Text: "The comparison to the dot-com crash isn't just about the number of failures. It's about the pattern. Back then, hundreds of internet companies vanished when the funding tap turned off. The ones that survived — Amazon, eBay, Google — had real business models underneath the hype. The same is playing out in crypto. The projects that last won't be the ones with the loudest marketing, but the ones with the strongest fundamentals."
Danish: "Sammenligningen med dot-com-krakket handler ikke kun om antallet af fiaskoer. Det handler om mønsteret. Dengang forsvandt hundredvis af internetvirksomheder, da finansieringshanen blev lukket. De, der overlevede – Amazon, eBay, Google – havde reelle forretningsmodeller under hypen. Det samme udspiller sig i krypto. De projekter, der varer ved, bliver ikke dem med den højeste markedsføring, men dem med de stærkeste fundamenter."
Seventh paragraph: "A leaner industry" -> "En slankere branche" or "En mere strømlinet branche". I'll use "En slankere branche".
Text: "For the projects that remain, the shakeout is a kind of cleansing. Fewer competitors means more attention for the ones still standing. But it also means the bar is higher. Anyone launching a crypto project now needs to show revenue, traction, and a path to profitability — or risk becoming another statistic."
Danish: "For de projekter, der er tilbage, er udrensningen en slags rensning. Færre konkurrenter betyder mere opmærksomhed for dem, der stadig står. Men det betyder også, at barren er højere. Enhver, der nu lancerer et kryptoprojekt, skal vise omsætning, fremdrift og en vej til rentabilitet – eller risikere at blive endnu en statistik."
Eighth paragraph: "The shakeout isn't over. More projects are expected to fold in the coming months as funding stays tight and the market continues to punish weak business models. The industry is smaller, but the ones left are the ones that deserve to be here."
Danish: "Udrensningen er ikke slut. Flere projekter forventes at gå ned i de kommende
