tags. Use proper German quotation marks? Not needed. Keep numbers as in original? Original has 4.03% and 0.77. In German, decimal comma is standard, but in crypto contexts, point is also used. I'll use comma for naturalness, but the requirement says "keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" - the number is 4.03, not 4,03. However, in German locale, 4.03 is written as 4,03. But to be safe, I'll keep the original format with point? The instruction says "Maintain the exact meaning and tone" and "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" - the number itself is 4.03, but representation can be adapted to German conventions. I think using comma is fine as it's the standard in German. But let's check: In the original meta description, it says "4%" without decimal. So I'll use "4,03%" in the article and "4%" in meta. For 0.77, I'll use "0,77". However, note that in German, the decimal separator is comma, but thousands separator is point. So 0.77 becomes 0,77. I'll do that.
Also, ensure proper nouns: PEPE, RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands remain as is. "Bollinger Bands" is often used in German as "Bollinger-Bänder" (with hyphen and umlaut). But the original uses "Bollinger Bands" without hyphen. I'll keep as "Bollinger Bänder" (capitalized, with umlaut) as that's the common German term. But to be consistent with original, maybe keep "Bollinger Bands"? The requirement says "Use appropriate German terminology for crypto/tech terms" - so I should use German terms where they exist. "Bollinger Bands" is an English term but widely used in German. However, the German term is "Bollinger-Bänder". I'll use "Bollinger Bänder" (without hyphen? Actually
