The decades-old link between the US-Japan interest rate gap and the yen exchange rate has snapped. Apollo Global Management says the yen carry trade broke down after April 2, 2025 — Liberation Day, when US tariffs were announced. Now, the yen is trading on Japan's fiscal outlook instead.
...
Translation: El vínculo de décadas entre la brecha de tasas de interés entre EE.UU. y Japón y el tipo de cambio del yen se ha roto. Apollo Global Management afirma que el carry trade del yen se desmoronó después del 2 de abril de 2025 — el Día de la Liberación, cuando se anunciaron los aranceles de EE.UU. Ahora, el yen se negocia según el panorama fiscal de Japón en lugar de la brecha de tasas.
...
We'll keep "Liberation Day" as "Día de la Liberación" but maybe it's a specific term, we can keep it in English? Actually, it's a term used for that day, but we can translate as "Día de la Liberación" with quotes? I'll keep it as "Día de la Liberación" but it's fine.
Next heading: The breakdown of the yen carry trade
-> El colapso del carry trade del yen
Paragraph: "For years, traders borrowed cheap yen to buy higher-yielding assets elsewhere. That strategy relied on a stable relationship: when the US-Japan rate gap widened, the yen weakened. When it narrowed, the yen strengthened. That pattern held for decades — until April 2025." -> "Durante años, los operadores tomaron prestados yenes baratos para comprar activos de mayor rendimiento en otros lugares. Esa estrategia se basaba en una relación estable: cuando la brecha de tasas entre EE.UU. y Japón se ampliaba, el yen se debilitaba. Cuando se estrechaba, el yen se fortalecía. Ese patrón se mantuvo durante décadas, hasta abril de 2025."
Next: "Torsten Slok, Apollo's chief economist, put it bluntly: “The yen carry trade has broken down… the yen will trade on Japan's fiscal outlook rather than the interest rate gap.”" -> "Torsten Slok, economista jefe de Apollo, lo dijo sin rodeos: “El carry trade del yen se ha roto… el yen se negociará según el panorama fiscal de Japón en lugar de la brecha de tasas de interés”."
Next: "The numbers back him up. On August 6, 2025, the US 10-year Treasury yield was 4.64%, while Japan's 10-year bond yield was 2.76%. That's a gap of about 1.8 percentage points. Historically, that would have kept the yen weak. Instead, the yen hit 164 per dollar in late July — its weakest in four decades — then bounced back to near 157.9. The old rules no longer apply." -> "Los números lo respaldan. El 6 de agosto de 2025, el rendimiento del Tesoro estadounidense a 10 años era del 4,64%, mientras que el rendimiento del bono japonés a 10 años era del 2,76%. Eso es una brecha de aproximadamente 1,8 puntos porcentuales. Históricamente, eso habría mantenido débil al yen. En cambio, el yen alcanzó 164 por dólar a finales de julio — su nivel más débil en cuatro décadas — y luego rebotó a cerca de 157,9. Las reglas antiguas ya no se aplican."
Note: Use comma for decimal? In Spanish, we use comma as decimal separator, but in financial contexts, sometimes they use period. I'll use comma: 4,64% and 2,76% and 1,8 puntos. But for numbers like 164, 157.9, we can keep as is? Actually, in Spanish, we use comma for decimals, so 157,9. But it's a currency rate, often written with period? I'll use comma for consistency: 157,9. But the original has 157.9, we can keep as 157,9. I'll do that.
Next heading: Japan's record budget and debt
-> El presupuesto y la deuda récord de Japón
Paragraph: "Japan's fiscal 2026 budget hit a record ¥122.31 trillion ($774.5 billion). Debt servicing costs alone are ¥31.28 trillion ($198.08 billion) — also a record. The government now assumes a long-term interest rate of 3.0% for its budget, up from 2.0% a year earlier." -> "El presupuesto fiscal de Japón para 2026 alcanzó un récord de ¥122,31 billones (774.500 millones de dólares). Solo los costos del servicio de la deuda ascienden a ¥31,28 billones (198.080 millones de dólares), también un récord. El gobierno ahora asume una tasa de interés a largo plazo del 3,0% para su presupuesto, frente al 2,0% del año anterior."
Note: In Spanish, "billones" means trillion? Actually, in Spanish, "billón" is a million million (10^12) in most Spanish-speaking countries, but in some places like Mexico, it's 10^9? But in financial context, we often use "billones" for trillion? Actually, in Spain, "billón" is 10^12, so it's correct. But to avoid confusion, we can say "122,31 billones de yenes" which is fine. We'll keep.
Next: "Japan's central government debt stood at ¥1,343.8 trillion ($8.51 trillion) as of March 31, 2025. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi defends the debt-financed spending plan. She aims for a primary balance surplus — the first since 1998 — and relies on ¥29.58 trillion ($187.3 billion) in fresh borrowing." -> "La deuda del gobierno central de Japón se situó en ¥1.343,8 billones (8,51 billones de dólares) al 31 de marzo de 2025. La primera ministra Sanae Takaichi defiende el plan de gasto financiado con deuda. Su objetivo es lograr un superávit primario — el primero desde 1998 — y depende de ¥29,58 billones (187.300 millones de dólares) en nuevo endeudamiento."
Note: "trillion" in English is 10^12, so we use "billones" in Spanish. For 1,343.8 trillion, we write "1.343,8 billones" (using period for thousands and comma for decimal). But in Spanish, we use period for thousands and comma for decimals. So we'll write "1.343,8 billones" and "8,51 billones". For 29.58 trillion, we write "29,58 billones". For 187.3 billion, that's 187.300 millones (since billion is 10^9, we use "mil millones" or "millones"? Actually, in Spanish, "mil millones" is 10^9, but often we say "millones" for billions? No, we say "mil millones" for billion. But in financial news, they often use "millones" for billions? Actually, in Spanish, "billón" is 10^12, so 1 billion is "mil millones". So 187.3 billion is 187.300 millones. We'll write "187.300 millones de dólares". Similarly, 774.5 billion is 774.500 millones. 198.08 billion is 198.080 millones. We'll do that.
Next: "That debt load is what investors are now watching. With the carry trade broken, the yen's fate is tied to whether Japan can manage its
