Loading market data...

Trade group says a coordinated rulebook would keep trading onshore and boost US competitiveness.

Trade group says a coordinated rulebook would keep trading onshore and boost US competitiveness.

... but no h1. So we'll use the given title. We need to translate the entire content into French, preserving HTML structure. Also translate the title and create a meta description in French. Let's translate the title: "Trade group says a coordinated rulebook would keep trading onshore and boost US competitiveness." -> "Un groupe professionnel affirme qu'un règlement coordonné maintiendrait les transactions sur le territoire et renforcerait la compétitivité des États-Unis." But we need to be more natural. Maybe: "Un groupe de défense du secteur affirme qu'un cadre réglementaire coordonné maintiendrait les échanges sur le sol américain et renforcerait la compétitivité des États-Unis." But the original says "Trade group" - could be "association professionnelle" or "groupe de pression". The Blockchain Association is a trade group. We'll use "groupe professionnel" or "association professionnelle". Let's use "association professionnelle" for clarity. Now translate the content. We'll go paragraph by paragraph. Original content:

The Blockchain Association is urging the SEC and CFTC to stop treating equity perpetuals as two separate products. The trade group says a coordinated rulebook would keep the trading onshore and give investors stronger protections. Without that coordination, it argues, volume will keep drifting to offshore venues.

Why the gap exists

Equity perpetuals sit in a gray zone between securities and derivatives. The SEC sees some of them as securities. The CFTC sees others as futures or swaps. For a firm that wants to offer the product, that means two sets of rules that don't line up. The group says that ambiguity pushes work offshore, where the rules are simpler and the enforcement is weaker.

The competitiveness case

The group also makes a competitiveness argument. A shared framework would give firms a clearer path to offer equity perpetuals in the US. That would let US venues compete with offshore markets that have already simplified their approach. The group's position is that the current split is a business incentive to leave.

What protection looks like

On investor protection, the group says offshore trading is the riskiest option. When a platform sits outside US jurisdiction, an investor has fewer tools when something goes wrong. A coordinated framework brings that activity back under the SEC's and the CFTC's view. Both agencies would be able to set rules, watch the market, and step in when a platform fails.

The request doesn't carry a deadline. It's a recommendation, not a rule. But it puts a question to the two agencies: whether they can share oversight of a product that doesn't fit neatly in either of their boxes. That's a test of coordination that has been slow to happen elsewhere.