tags.
Meta description: "राष्ट्रपति ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा कि रूस ने यूक्रेन पर रात भर के बड़े हमले में 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे। नुकसान और हताहतों के विवरण अभी सामने आ रहे हैं।" – but we need to be accurate.
Let's write the translation.
We'll produce JSON.
Note: The content includes an tag. We'll keep it.
Now, translate each part:
Original title: "Russia Launches 35 Missiles, 185 Drones in Attack on Ukraine, Zelenskiy Says"
Hindi: "रूस ने यूक्रेन पर हमले में 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे, ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा" – but we might want to keep the structure: "ज़ेलेंस्की के अनुसार, रूस ने यूक्रेन पर हमले में 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे" – but the original says "Zelenskiy Says" at the end, so we can put it at the end: "रूस ने यूक्रेन पर हमले में 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे, ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा" – that works.
Content:
Paragraph 1: "Russia fired 35 missiles and 185 drones at Ukraine in a large-scale overnight assault, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said. The attack combined both cruise and ballistic missiles with a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles, marking one of the heavier barrages in recent weeks."
Translation: "राष्ट्रपति वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा कि रूस ने रात भर के बड़े हमले में यूक्रेन पर 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे। इस हमले में क्रूज़ और बैलिस्टिक मिसाइलों के साथ-साथ मानवरहित हवाई वाहनों का झुंड शामिल था, जो हाल के हफ्तों में सबसे भारी बमबारी में से एक है।"
We need to keep "Volodymyr" – we can write "वोलोदिमिर" but the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form? It says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" – that means we should keep "Volodymyr Zelenskiy" as is? But in Hindi, we often transliterate. However, the instruction is explicit: "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" – so we should write "Volodymyr Zelenskiy" in Latin script? But that might be odd in Hindi text. Usually, we transliterate. But the instruction says "original form" – I think they mean we should not translate the meaning, but we can transliterate. For example, "Zelenskiy" is already in English, we can write "ज़ेलेंस्की" which is a transliteration. But the instruction says "original form" – that could mean we keep it as "Zelenskiy" in English? That would be weird. I think they mean we should not translate the name into a Hindi equivalent, but we can transliterate. In the title, we have "Zelenskiy" – we can write "ज़ेलेंस्की". That is a transliteration. So I'll use transliteration.
Also, "Volodymyr" – we can write "वोलोदिमिर" but maybe we can just use "ज़ेलेंस्की" as the president's name. In the first paragraph, it says "President Volodymyr Zelenskiy" – we can say "राष्ट्रपति वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की" – but to keep it simple, we can say "राष्ट्रपति ज़ेलेंस्की" – but we need to be accurate. I'll transliterate the full name: "वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की" – but note that in Hindi, we often write "व्लादिमीर" but that's the Russian version. Actually, Volodymyr is Ukrainian. So we'll write "वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की".
But the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" – that might mean we should not translate them, but we can transliterate. I'll do that.
Now, "unmanned aerial vehicles" – we can say "मानवरहित हवाई वाहन" or we can use "ड्रोन" which is common. But we already have "ड्रोन" for drones. So we can say "ड्रोन" for both. But we need to differentiate: "a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles" – we can say "मानवरहित हवाई वाहनों का झुंड" – that's fine.
"barrages" – we can say "बमबारी" or "गोलाबारी".
So paragraph 1: "राष्ट्रपति वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा कि रूस ने रात भर के बड़े हमले में यूक्रेन पर 35 मिसाइलें और 185 ड्रोन दागे। इस हमले में क्रूज़ और बैलिस्टिक मिसाइलों के साथ-साथ मानवरहित हवाई वाहनों का झुंड शामिल था, जो हाल
