tags and the market snapshot div. The original content includes a market snapshot with specific numbers (like -1.50%, -2.90%, 29, $62,806). The instruction says "Don't insert prices, market caps, percentages, RSI, support/resistance, or on-chain numbers." But these numbers are already in the original content. The instruction is for the article we are writing, but here we are translating an existing article. The original article includes these numbers. We should keep them as they are, because we are translating, not creating new content. The instruction says "Maintain the exact meaning and tone" and "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate". So we should keep the numbers as they are. However, the original content also has some internal notes like "That's about 400 words. We need to expand a bit." etc. Those are not part of the article; they are instructions to the writer. We should ignore those and only translate the actual article content. The article content is from the tag. So we need to extract the HTML content and translate it.
Let's parse the original content. The original content is given as a string. It starts with "ORIGINAL TITLE: should be factual, not clickbait. The content should be 450-700 words. We must avoid AI tells, use c" - that seems like a note. Then it says "ORIGINAL CONTENT:" and then the article. The article is within tags. So we need to translate the HTML inside the tags. The article includes a lead paragraph, then sections with
tags, and a market snapshot div. We need to translate all text content, but keep the HTML tags and structure. Also, we need to translate the meta description. The original meta description is empty, but we need to provide a translated one. We can create a meta description based on the content.
We should also note that the original content includes some phrases like "Trump said" and "Leavitt" etc. We need to keep proper nouns in original form. So "Karoline Leavitt" stays as is, "Trump" stays as "Trump" (or maybe "트럼프" but the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so we keep "Trump" in English). Similarly, "White House" might be translated as "백악관" but it's a proper noun? Actually, "White House" is a proper noun, but it's commonly translated. The instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we keep "White House" as "White House" or maybe "백악관" is acceptable? But to be safe, we can keep it as "White House" or translate to "백악관" if it's a common translation. However, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we should keep "White House" as "White House" in English. But in Korean, it's often translated. I think we can translate it as "백악관" because it's a well-known translation. But the instruction says "keep proper nouns in original form" - that might mean we don't translate names like "Karoline Leavitt" or "Trump". For "White House", it's a place, but it's also a proper noun. I'll keep it as "백악관" because it's standard. But to be consistent, I'll keep "Trump" as "트럼프" maybe? Actually, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we should keep "Trump" as "Trump" and "Karoline Leavitt" as "Karoline Leavitt". For "White House", it's a proper noun but it's a common term. I'll translate it as "백악관" because it's a standard translation. But let's see: the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we keep "Trump" and "Leavitt" as is. For "White House", it's not a person or company, it's a building, so we can translate it. I'll use "백악관" for White House.
Also, we need to translate the market snapshot. The numbers are there, we keep them. The text like "24h Change" etc. should be translated. "Fear & Greed" is a term, we can translate as "공포·탐욕 지수" or keep as is? We'll translate.
We need to produce the JSON. Let's write the translation.
First, let's extract the article content. The original content is:
tags. Let's structure: - Lead paragraph (2-3 sentences)
- Section 1: "A family decision" - explain the reason, no speculation.
- Section 2: "No market reaction" - note that crypto is focused on macro, this is a non-event.
- Section 3: "A quieter briefing room" - the press secretary controls messaging, could delay crypto announcements.
- Section 4: "The maturation signal" - the market's indifference shows crypto is no longer hypersensitive to White House personnel. We need to keep it 450-700 words. Let's write. We must not fabricate quotes. We can paraphrase Trump's statement. We can say "Trump said" but not quote directly because we don't have the exact words. We can say "Trump cited her desire to spend time with her children" etc. We also need to include the meta description and keywords. Let's write the content. I'll write the article in plain text first, then convert to HTML. Draft: President Trump announced that White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt will leave her post to spend time with her young children and family. The departure, confirmed by the President, ends a tenure that saw Leavitt become a familiar face in the briefing room, often defending the administration's pro-crypto positions. For digital asset markets, the news is a non-event — but it could briefly quiet the White House's messaging on crypto policy.
A family decision
Trump said Leavitt is stepping down to focus on her family, specifically her young children. The announcement didn't include a timeline or a named successor. Leavitt has been a prominent figure in the administration, regularly fielding questions on everything from inflation to digital asset regulation. Her exit leaves a gap in the daily communications operation, though the President's own statements on crypto are unlikely to change.
No market reaction
Crypto traders barely noticed. Bitcoin is trading lower this week, but that's tied to macro headwinds — inflation data, Fed policy, and a risk-off mood across risk assets. The press secretary's departure has zero direct bearing on supply, demand, or regulation. The market's indifference is itself a signal: digital assets are no longer swinging on every White House personnel move, a shift from the 2021-2022 era when a single presidential tweet could move BTC by 5%.
A quieter briefing room
The press secretary doesn't set policy, but they control the daily narrative. Leavitt has been one of the few administration officials to publicly defend the President's crypto-friendly stance in briefings. Her replacement could be less aligned with that rhetoric, which might subtly shift how Congress and the public perceive the administration's digital asset agenda. More immediately, a transition period often means quieter official statements. If the administration was planning to announce a pro-crypto executive order or endorse a bill like FIT21 in the next few weeks, the absence of a press secretary could delay that messaging or reduce its amplification.
The maturation signal
The fact that this news is a non-event for crypto is, in itself, notable. It confirms that traders and institutions are pricing digital assets based on Fed policy, inflation, and ETF flows — not on who stands
