Nine of the largest technology companies are carrying $3.1 trillion in off-balance sheet commitments tied to artificial intelligence, a sum large enough to threaten their financial stability if the AI boom loses momentum. The obligations are not recorded as liabilities on their balance sheets, but they still represent real money that could have to be paid out.
...
Translation: "Sembilan daripada syarikat teknologi terbesar sedang menanggung komitmen luar kunci kira-kira bernilai $3.1 trilion yang berkaitan dengan kecerdasan buatan, jumlah yang cukup besar untuk mengancam kestabilan kewangan mereka jika ledakan AI kehilangan momentum. Obligasi tersebut tidak direkodkan sebagai liabiliti dalam kunci kira-kira mereka, tetapi ia masih mewakili wang sebenar yang mungkin perlu dibayar."
We need to be careful with "off-balance sheet" - in Malay, it's "luar kunci kira-kira" or "di luar kunci kira-kira". "Kunci kira-kira" is balance sheet. So "komitmen luar kunci kira-kira" is fine.
"AI" is commonly used as is. "Kecerdasan buatan" is the full term, but we can use "AI" as well. Since the article uses "AI" in the title, we can keep "AI" in the content too, but for clarity, we might use "kecerdasan buatan" at first mention. But the title uses "AI", so we can keep it consistent. I'll use "AI" throughout.
"loses momentum" -> "kehilangan momentum" is fine.
"real money" -> "wang sebenar" or "wang sebenar" is fine.
Next paragraph: The $3.1 Trillion Exposure
-> "Pendedahan $3.1 Trilion
" or "Eksposur" but "pendedahan" is more common for exposure in financial context. Actually, "exposure" in finance often means the amount at risk. "Pendedahan" works.
Then: "Off-balance sheet commitments are contractual obligations that don't show up under standard accounting liabilities. For these nine giants, the total tied to AI is $3.1 trillion. That figure is not a typo. It spans contracts for infrastructure, computing capacity, and other AI-related services, though the exact breakdown isn't public."
Translation: "Komitmen luar kunci kira-kira adalah obligasi kontrak yang tidak muncul di bawah liabiliti perakaunan standard. Bagi sembilan gergasi ini, jumlah yang dikaitkan dengan AI ialah $3.1 trilion. Angka itu bukan kesilapan menaip. Ia merangkumi kontrak untuk infrastruktur, kapasiti pengkomputeran, dan perkhidmatan berkaitan AI yang lain, walaupun pecahan tepat tidak didedahkan kepada umum."
"computing capacity" -> "kapasiti pengkomputeran" is fine.
"isn't public" -> "tidak didedahkan kepada umum" or "tidak awam". I'll use "tidak didedahkan kepada umum".
Next: "Because the commitments sit off the balance sheet, they're easier to ignore in routine financial reporting. But they're not optional. When a company signs a long-term deal to buy cloud capacity or pay for specialized chips, it's on the hook for the full amount, even if the AI project doesn't generate the expected returns."
Translation: "Kerana komitmen tersebut berada di luar kunci kira-kira, ia lebih mudah diabaikan dalam pelaporan kewangan rutin. Tetapi ia bukan pilihan. Apabila syarikat menandatangani perjanjian jangka panjang untuk membeli kapasiti awan atau membayar cip khusus, ia terikat untuk membayar jumlah penuh, walaupun projek AI tidak menghasilkan pulangan yang dijangka."
"cloud capacity" -> "kapasiti awan" is fine. "specialized chips" -> "cip khusus" or "cip khas". "on the hook" -> "terikat" or "bertanggungjawab". I'll use "terikat" to be consistent.
Next: Why Demand Could Break the Chain
-> "Mengapa Permintaan Boleh Memutuskan Rantaian
" or "Mengapa Permintaan Boleh Menjejaskan Rantaian" but "break the chain" means disrupt. "Memutuskan rantaian" is literal. Maybe "Mengapa Permintaan Boleh Menjejaskan Rantaian" but that's not exactly. I'll use "Memutuskan" as in break.
Then: "The core risk is simple: AI demand might not stay as strong as the commitments assume. If businesses and consumers pull back on AI tools, revenue for these nine companies could slow. The companies would still have to honor their contracts, but without the income to cover them."
Translation: "Risiko teras adalah mudah: permintaan AI mungkin tidak kekal sekuat seperti yang diandaikan oleh komitmen tersebut. Jika perniagaan dan pengguna menarik diri daripada alat AI, hasil untuk sembilan syarikat ini mungkin perlahan. Syarikat-syarikat itu masih perlu memenuhi kontrak mereka, tetapi tanpa pendapatan untuk menampungnya."
"pull back" -> "menarik diri" or "mengurangkan penggunaan". I'll use "menarik diri" but that might imply completely stopping. "Pull back" means reduce
