Loading market data...

FalconX Bravo Asks SEC to Treat Some Perpetuals as Security-Based Swaps

FalconX Bravo Asks SEC to Treat Some Perpetuals as Security-Based Swaps

and

tags. We'll translate the text inside, preserving HTML. Let's translate: First paragraph: "FalconX Bravo, a CFTC-registered swap dealer focused on digital assets, filed a proposal on Aug. 12 asking the SEC and CFTC to treat certain cash-settled perpetuals tied to a single security or a narrow-based security index as security-based swaps under SEC rules when they fall outside the joint SEC-CFTC security-futures framework. The request explicitly includes contracts offered through DeFi protocols. The public comment window closed on Aug. 24, but the proposal itself is not agency policy and commits neither regulator to rulemaking." Translation: "FalconX Bravo, en CFTC-registrert swap-forhandler som fokuserer på digitale eiendeler, sendte inn et forslag 12. august der de ber SEC og CFTC om å behandle visse kontantoppgjorte perpetualer knyttet til et enkelt verdipapir eller en smal verdipapirindeks som verdipapirbaserte swapper under SEC-regler når de faller utenfor det felles SEC-CFTC-rammeverket for verdipapirfutures. Forespørselen inkluderer eksplisitt kontrakter som tilbys gjennom DeFi-protokoller. Den offentlige kommentarfristen utløp 24. august, men forslaget i seg selv er ikke byråpolitikk og forplikter verken regulator til regelverksendringer." Note: "cash-settled" -> "kontantoppgjorte" (cash-settled) is fine. "narrow-based security index" -> "smal verdipapirindeks" (narrow-based security index). "security-futures framework" -> "rammeverket for verdipapirfutures" (security futures). "rulemaking" -> "regelverksendringer" or "regelverk" but I'll use "regelverksendringer" to convey the process. Second paragraph: "What the proposal covers" -> "Hva forslaget dekker" Then: "The definition applies to specified perpetuals and options on them, but does not extend to Bitcoin perpetuals or crypto perpetuals generally. Contracts listed as security futures products on an authorized market stay in the existing joint SEC-CFTC regime. FalconX's examples include bilateral and over-the-counter transactions, contracts offered by eligible venues, non-US venues, and comparable DeFi protocols." Translation: "Definisjonen gjelder spesifiserte perpetualer og opsjoner på dem, men omfatter ikke Bitcoin-perpetualer eller krypto-perpetualer generelt. Kontrakter som er notert som verdipapirfutures-produkter på et autorisert marked, forblir i det eksisterende felles SEC-CFTC-regimet. FalconX sine eksempler inkluderer bilaterale og over-the-counter-transaksjoner, kontrakter tilbudt av kvalifiserte plattformer, ikke-amerikanske plattformer og sammenlignbare DeFi-protokoller." Note: "eligible venues" -> "kvalifiserte plattformer" (venues) - could also be "godkjente handelsplasser" but "plattformer" is fine. "over-the-counter" is often kept as "over-the-counter" or "OTC" but I'll use "over-the-counter" as is. Third paragraph: "What it would mean for dealers" -> "Hva det ville bety for forhandlere" Then: "For affected dealers, SEC treatment can trigger registration, business-conduct, transaction-reporting, capital, margin, and segregation requirements. But the proposal would not automatically force every protocol developer or trader to register. FalconX also asks the SEC to reduce duplicated requirements for firms already overseen by the CFTC, amending Rule 18a-10 to raise the combined-notional threshold for alternative compliance from 10% to 49%." Translation: "For berørte forhandlere kan SEC-behandling utløse krav om registrering, forretningsatferd, transaksjonsrapportering, kapital, margin og segregering. Men forslaget vil ikke automatisk tvinge enhver protokollutvikler eller trader til å registrere seg. FalconX ber også SEC om å redusere dupliserte krav for firmaer som allerede er under tilsyn av CFTC, ved å endre regel 18a-10 for å heve terskelen for kombinert nominell verdi for alternativ etterlevelse fra 10% til 49%." Note: "business-conduct" -> "forretningsatferd" (business conduct) - could also be "forretningsskikk" but "atferd" is fine. "segregation" -> "segregering" (segregation) - in finance, it's often "separasjon" but "segregering" is used. "combined-notional threshold" -> "terskel for kombinert nominell verdi" (combined notional threshold). "alternative compliance" -> "alternativ etterlevelse" (alternative compliance) - could also be "alternativ overholdelse" but "etterlevelse" is common. Fourth paragraph: "A different take from a commenter" -> "Et annet syn fra en kommentator" Then: "Independent researcher Amadeus Brandes filed a comment on Aug. 21 recommending the existing mixed-swap process, with protections that address insider information, manipulation, leverage, and funding-rate risks. That approach would keep the products under the current joint framework rather than shifting them to SEC-only rules." Translation: "Uavhengig forsker Amadeus Brandes sendte inn en kommentar 21. august der han anbefalte den eksisterende prosessen for blandede swapper, med beskyttelser som adresserer innsideinformasjon, manipulasjon, innflytelse og finansieringsrenterisiko. Den tilnærmingen ville holde produktene under det nåværende felles rammeverket i stedet for å flytte dem til SEC-only-regler." Note: "mixed-swap process" -> "prosessen for blandede swapper" (mixed swaps) - "mixed swap" is a term for swaps that are both security-based and commodity-based. "funding-rate risks" -> "finansieringsrenterisiko" (funding rate risk) - "funding rate" is often "finansieringsrente" in crypto context. "leverage" -> "innflytelse" (leverage) - could also be "gearing" but "innflytelse" is common. Fifth paragraph: "Where things stand" -> "Hvor ting står" Then: "Closing the comment window changes no jurisdictional rule and commits neither agency to any next step. The CFTC's June policy statement reserved other asset classes for separate review, and it identified equity and narrow-index products as distinct regulatory questions. So the docket is now quiet, and any action depends on what the SEC and CFTC decide to do next." Translation: "Å lukke kommentarfristen endrer ingen jurisdiksjonsregel og forplikter verken byrået til noe neste skritt. CFTCs politiske uttalelse fra juni reserver