. Translate each paragraph.
First paragraph: "Bitcoin surged 3% to trade above $82,000 on Thursday, notching more than $1 billion in 24-hour spot volume. The same day, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee advanced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) by a 15-9 vote, moving the bill one step closer to a full floor debate."
Translation: "O Bitcoin subiu 3% para ser negociado acima de US$ 82.000 na quinta-feira, registrando mais de US$ 1 bilhão em volume spot em 24 horas. No mesmo dia, o U.S. Senate Banking Committee avançou o Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) por uma votação de 15 a 9, movendo o projeto um passo mais perto de um debate completo no plenário."
Note: "spot volume" -> "volume spot" (crypto term). "floor debate" -> "debate no plenário".
Second paragraph: H2 "What the Clarity Act does" -> "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" (but keep act name in English? Actually the heading is "What the Clarity Act does" - "Clarity Act" is a shorthand. I'll translate the heading as "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" but note that the act name is still English. Alternatively, keep "What the Clarity Act does" in English? No, translate headings. I'll translate the heading naturally: "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" - but the "Clarity Act" is a proper noun? It's a nickname. I'll keep "Clarity Act" in English within the heading? Better to translate the heading but keep the proper noun. For consistency, I'll keep "Clarity Act" untranslated in the heading. But the heading is part of the content. Let's decide: The requirement says "Maintain the exact meaning and tone" and "Translate naturally". I think translating the heading to Portuguese while keeping the act name in English is fine: "O que o Clarity Act faz" or "O que a Lei Clarity Act faz"? That sounds awkward. Better: "O que a Lei de Clareza de Ativos Digitais faz" but that's the full name. However, the original heading uses "Clarity Act" as a short form. In Portuguese, we can say "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" but then the word "Clareza" is a translation of "Clarity". That might be acceptable as the act is known by its English name. I'll go with "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" and in the text, I'll use the full English name when first mentioned. Actually in the first paragraph, the full name is used. In the heading, it's shortened. I'll translate the heading as "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" and in the text, keep the English name. But to be safe, I'll keep the heading in English? No, the requirement says translate the article. So I'll translate headings.
Let's proceed:
H2: "O que a Lei de Clareza faz" (but note: the original says "Clarity Act" which is a proper noun; I'll use "Lei de Clareza" as a translation, but then later in the paragraph, I'll use the original English name for consistency. I think it's fine.)
Then paragraph: "The legislation would split federal oversight of digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It defines which agency regulates tokens, stablecoins, and intermediaries, a jurisdictional question that has tripped up enforcement for years. The committee vote was largely along party lines, with all but one Republican supporting and all Democrats opposed."
Translation: "A legislação dividiria a supervisão federal de ativos digitais entre a Securities and Exchange Commission e a Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Ela define qual agência regula tokens, stablecoins e intermediários, uma questão jurisdicional que tem atrapalhado a aplicação da lei por anos. A votação no comitê foi amplamente partidária, com todos menos um republicano apoiando e todos os democratas se opondo."
Keep SEC and CFTC in English. "tokens, stablecoins" - keep as is. "intermediaries" -> "intermediários". "enforcement" -> "aplicação da lei".
Next H2: "Bitcoin's move past $82K" -> "Movimento do Bitcoin acima de US$ 82 mil"
Paragraph: "Bitfinex analysts attributed the rally to spot ETF inflows and long-term accumulation, not to corporate buying linked to Strategy Inc. (STRC). Long-horizon investors now hold roughly 4 million bitcoin, the strongest two-quarter accumulation streak since the COVID-19 crash in 2020. That suggests patient money, not speculative frenzy, is pushing prices higher."
Translation: "Analistas da Bitfinex atribuíram a alta a influxos de ETFs spot e acumulação de longo prazo, e não a compras corporativas ligadas à Strategy Inc. (STRC). Investidores de longo horizonte agora detêm aproximadamente 4 milhões de bitcoins, a sequência de acumulação mais forte em dois trimestres desde o crash da COVID-19 em 2020. Isso sugere que dinheiro paciente, e não frenesi especulativo, está empurrando os preços para cima."
Note: "spot ETF" -> "ETFs spot" (common term). "Long-horizon investors" -> "Investidores de longo horizonte". "patient money" -> "dinheiro paciente".
Next H2: "Corporate accumulation continues" -> "Acumulação corporativa continua"
Paragraph: "Strategy Inc. (STRC) reported $1.24 billion in issuance volume this week, acquiring about 11,
