Then:
24h Change -> Variação 24h
+1.04% stays (number)
7d Change -> Variação 7d
-1.95% stays
Fear & Greed -> Medo e Ganância (but keep "Fear & Greed" as proper? The index name is Fear & Greed Index. In Portuguese it's "Índice de Medo e Ganância". But in the snapshot it says "Fear & Greed" as label, then value "28 Fear". We can translate label as "Medo e Ganância", and value "28 Medo". But original has "Fear" as part of value. We'll keep "Fear" as "Medo" but it's a label. Actually the value is "28 Fear". That span text "Fear" should be translated to "Medo". Similarly "Sentiment" label -> "Sentimento", value "🔴 slightly bearish" -> "🔴 ligeiramente baixista". Also Bitcoin line: "Bitcoin (BTC):" stays, "$76,701" stays, "Rank #1" -> "Classificação #1".
We must preserve the style attributes and structure. We'll translate only the text nodes.
Next h2: "Why trust in legacy institutions matters for crypto" -> "Por que a confiança em instituições tradicionais é importante para a cripto"
Content: "Though the story has no direct link to digital assets, it fits into a pattern that the crypto industry has long cited as its raison d'être: institutional failure. When a public service broadcaster—a pillar of traditional media credibility—finds itself at the center of a rape scandal, trust in centralized gatekeepers takes another hit. That erosion, however gradual, reinforces the appeal of trustless, censorship-resistant systems. But the effect is diffuse. With the Fear & Greed Index at 28 (Fear) and Bitcoin consolidating around $76,700, macro headwinds dwarf any narrative tailwind from a non-crypto scandal."
Translation: "Embora a história não tenha ligação direta com ativos digitais, ela se encaixa em um padrão que a indústria cripto há muito cita como sua razão de ser: a falha institucional. Quando uma emissora de serviço público — um pilar da credibilidade da mídia tradicional — se vê no centro de um escândalo de estupro, a confiança nos guardiões centralizados sofre outro golpe. Essa erosão, por mais gradual que seja, reforça o apelo de sistemas sem confiança e resistentes à censura. Mas o efeito é difuso. Com o Índice de Medo e Ganância em 28 (Medo) e o Bitcoin se consolidando em torno de US$ 76.700, os ventos contrários macroeconômicos superam qualquer impulso narrativo de um escândalo não cripto."
Note: "raison d'être" can stay as is or translate to "razão de ser". I'll use "razão de ser". Use "US$" for dollar. "Fear & Greed Index" -> "Índice de Medo e Ganância". "Fear" in parentheses -> "Medo". "non-crypto" -> "não cripto".
Next h2: "The blockchain consent angle" -> "O ângulo do consentimento via blockchain"
Content: "The allegations highlight a use case that blockchain advocates have pushed for years: immutable, timestamped consent records. In high-pressure environments like reality TV, verbal or written consent can later be disputed. An on-chain record—signed by all parties and time-stamped—would provide an auditable trail that protects both participants and producers. Some legal experts argue that UK regulators like Ofcom could eventually mandate such systems for shows involving intimate or high-risk scenarios. That would open a new, non-financial frontier for blockchain adoption: social contracts."
Translation: "As alegações destacam um caso de uso que os defensores do blockchain promovem há anos: registros de consentimento imut
