Loading market data...

Senate Faces Four-Day Window to Pass Crypto CLARITY Act as White House Considers Ethics Deal

Senate Faces Four-Day Window to Pass Crypto CLARITY Act as White House Considers Ethics Deal

tags, etc. We'll translate the title: "Senate Faces Four-Day Window to Pass Crypto CLARITY Act as White House Considers Ethics Deal" -> we need to translate to Arabic but keep "Senate", "CLARITY Act", "White House" as is. So something like: "مجلس الشيوخ يواجه نافذة أربعة أيام لتمرير قانون CLARITY للعملات المشفرة بينما يدرس البيت الأبيض صفقة أخلاقية" but we need to keep "Senate" as is? Actually, "مجلس الشيوخ" is the translation of Senate. But the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form. So we should write "Senate" in English. But that might be confusing. Let's interpret: "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - this likely means don't translate names like "John Smith" or "Apple" but for institutions like "Senate" it's a common noun? Actually, "Senate" is a proper noun referring to a specific body. In Arabic, it's often translated. But to follow instruction strictly, we'll keep it as "Senate". Similarly "White House" as "White House". So the title could be: "Senate يواجه نافذة أربعة أيام لتمرير قانون CLARITY للعملات المشفرة بينما يدرس White House صفقة أخلاقية" - that looks odd. Maybe we can put them in parentheses or use transliteration? But the instruction says "in original form" so we keep the English spelling. I think it's acceptable to keep them as English words within the Arabic sentence. For example: "يواجه مجلس الشيوخ (Senate) نافذة..." but that adds extra. Better to just use the English word as is. In Arabic news, they often use "السينات" but that's transliteration. The instruction says "original form" so we use "Senate". So we'll do that. Alternatively, we could interpret that we should keep the names of acts and companies, but for government bodies we can translate. But the instruction says "proper nouns (names, company names)" - it doesn't explicitly say government bodies. But "Senate" is a proper noun. I'll err on the side of keeping them as is. Let's proceed. We'll translate the content paragraph by paragraph. Original: "The Senate has just four legislative days to advance the CLARITY Act before the August recess, and the White House is weighing an ethics compromise that could break the logjam. The bipartisan agreement that would bring regulatory clarity to digital assets remains unresolved, leaving industry groups scrambling to push the bill over the finish line." Translation: "أمام مجلس الشيوخ (Senate) أربعة أيام تشريعية فقط للمضي قدمًا في قانون CLARITY قبل عطلة أغسطس، ويدرس البيت الأبيض (White House) حلاً أخلاقيًا قد يكسر الجمود. لا يزال الاتفاق الحزبي الذي من شأنه أن يجلب وضوحًا تنظيميًا للأصول الرقمية غير محسوم، مما يترك المجموعات الصناعية تتسابق لدفع مشروع القانون إلى خط النهاية." But we need to keep "Senate" and "White House" as is. So we can write: "أمام Senate أربعة أيام تشريعية فقط للمضي قدمًا في قانون CLARITY قبل عطلة أغسطس، ويدرس White House حلاً أخلاقيًا قد يكسر الجمود." That might be acceptable. But it's a bit jarring. Maybe we can put them in parentheses? The instruction says "in original form" so we can write "مجلس الشيوخ (Senate)" but that's not original form, it's a translation plus original. I think it's better to just use the English word. In Arabic news, they often use "البيت الأبيض" for White House, but that's a translation. The instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so we should not translate. So we'll use "White House" and "Senate" as is. Let's do that. We'll also translate "CLARITY Act" as "قانون CLARITY" but keep "CLARITY" as is. Now, the second paragraph: "Why the clock is ticking" -> we need to translate the heading. We'll keep the

tag. "Lawmakers return to Washington this week with a packed schedule. The August recess is a hard deadline — if the CLARITY Act doesn't pass before then, the entire process resets in September, when competing priorities like government funding and defense authorization will dominate floor time. Supporters of the bill argue that waiting until fall risks losing momentum entirely." Translation: "يعود المشرعون إلى واشنطن هذا الأسبوع بجدول أعمال مزدحم. عطلة أغسطس هي موعد نهائي صارم — إذا لم يتم تمرير قانون CLARITY قبل ذلك، فإن العملية برمتها تعاد في سبتمبر، عندما تهيمن أولويات متنافسة مثل تمويل الحكومة وتفويض الدفاع على وقت الجلسة. يجادل مؤيدو مشروع القانون بأن الانتظار حتى الخريف يخاطر بفقدان الزخم تمامًا." We need to keep "Washington" as is? It's a proper noun, but it's a city name. The instruction says keep proper nouns, so we keep "Washington" as is. But in Arabic, it's often "واشنطن". But we'll keep "Washington" as is. Actually, the instruction says "names" - so we keep "Washington" as is. So we'll write "واشنطن" but that's a translation. To be safe, we'll keep "Washington" in English. But that might be odd. Let's check: The instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we should not translate "Washington" to "واشنطن". So we'll write "Washington" as is. Similarly "September" is a month, not a proper noun? Actually, months are not proper nouns in English? They are capitalized but they are common nouns? In Arabic, we translate months. But the instruction says proper nouns, so months are not proper nouns. So we can translate "September" to "سبتمبر". Similarly "August" to "أغسطس". So we'll translate months. So we'll keep "Washington" as is, but translate "August" and "September". Now, the third paragraph: "The ethics compromise under discussion" -> heading. "The White House is reportedly considering a deal that would address lawmakers' ethics concerns tied to the legislation. Details of the proposed compromise remain vague, but sources familiar with the talks say it could involve tighter disclosure requirements for digital asset holdings by members of Congress or their staff. The administration has not publicly confirmed the discussions." Translation: "يقال إن White House يدرس صفقة من شأنها معالجة مخاوف المشرعين الأخلاقية المرتبطة بالتشريع. تظيلاتيل