"24h Change" -> "24h změna"
"7d Change" -> "7denní změna"
"Fear & Greed" -> "Strach a chamtivost" (but keep the index name? Actually it's a proper name, but we can translate the label. The value "27" and then "Fear" in span. Translate "Fear" to "Strach".
"Sentiment" -> "Sentiment" (same in Czech) or "Nálada". I'll use "Sentiment" as it's common. Value: "🔴 mírně medvědí" (slightly bearish).
Bottom: "Bitcoin (BTC): $63,887 Pořadí #1" (Rank #1 -> Pořadí #1)
Also note: The original has "Fear & Greed Index" earlier, we translated as "index strachu a chamtivosti". In the snapshot, the label is "Fear & Greed" - we can keep as "Strach a chamtivost" or "Fear & Greed" with translation? I'll translate the label to "Strach a chamtivost" but keep the value "27" and then "Strach" in span. That's consistent.
Next h2: "Iran's mining exposure" -> "Íránská těžební expozice" or "Vystavení Íránu těžbě"? Better: "Írán a těžba bitcoinů" or "Dopad na íránskou těžbu". Let's use "Íránská těžební expozice" as direct translation, but might be unclear. Alternatively: "Vliv na íránskou těžbu". I'll go with "Íránská těžební expozice" since it's a heading.
Paragraph: "What most coverage misses is the direct impact on Bitcoin's infrastructure. Iran accounts for an estimated 3-5% of global Bitcoin hash rate, thanks to cheap subsidized energy from power plants that could be targeted in US strikes. A disruption to Iranian mining would cause a temporary hash rate drop, slower block times, and a subsequent downward difficulty adjustment. Historically, such adjustments have been followed by price increases as mining becomes more profitable for remaining miners. But the immediate effect could be a sell-off as Iranian miners liquidate holdings to cover operational losses. For traders who understand the difficulty adjustment cycle, this could create a short-term buying opportunity."
Translation: "Co většina zpravodajství přehlíží, je přímý dopad na infrastrukturu Bitcoinu. Írán se podílí odhadem 3–5 % na celosvětovém hash rate Bitcoinu, a to díky levné dotované energii z elektráren, které by se mohly stát terčem amerických úderů. Narušení íránské těžby by způsobilo dočasný pokles hash rate, pomalejší dobu bloků a následné snížení obtížnosti. Historicky po takových úpravách následoval růst cen, protože těžba se stala ziskovější pro zbývající těžaře. Okamžitým efektem by však mohl být výprodej, protože íránští těžaři likvidují své držby, aby pokryli provozní ztráty. Pro obchodníky, kteří rozumí cyklu úprav obtížnosti, by to mohlo vytvořit krátkodobou nákupní příležitost."
Note: "hash rate" kept as is. "block times" -> "doba bloků". "difficulty adjustment" -> "úprava obtížnosti" or "snížení obtížnosti" (downward). "liquidate holdings" -> "likvidují své držby". "operational losses" -> "provozní ztráty".
Next h2: "What history suggests" -> "Co naznačuje historie"
Paragraph: "The closest parallel is the US drone strike that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. Iran retaliated by firing missiles at US bases in Iraq, and the US threatened further strikes. Back then, Bitcoin saw a short-term rally as a safe haven, but the effect was transient. Over 30 days, further gains were possible if tensions escalated, but over 90 days the impact faded unless the conflict disrupted global markets. This time, the market is more mature but also more correlated to traditional risk assets. A repeat of the 2020 pattern — a 5-10% spike followed by consolidation — is plausible, but the outcome depends on whether the
