US Strikes on Iran Threaten 4% of Bitcoin Hash Rate as Crypto Markets Brace for Volatility

... etc. Translate each paragraph. First paragraph: "The US military launched strikes on Iran this week in response to Iran's firing on US bases in Jordan. The strikes, described as a 'powerful response', inject fresh geopolitical uncertainty into already fragile crypto markets. Bitcoin is trading near $63,800 with the Fear & Greed Index at 27 (Extreme Fear), and traders are watching for a potential test of the $60,000 support level." Danish: "Det amerikanske militær indledte denne uge angreb på Iran som svar på Irans beskydning af amerikanske baser i Jordan. Angrebene, der beskrives som en 'kraftig reaktion', tilfører ny geopolitisk usikkerhed til de allerede skrøbelige kryptomarkeder. Bitcoin handles nær $63.800 med Fear & Greed Index på 27 (Ekstrem frygt), og handlere holder øje med en potentiel test af støtteniveauet på $60.000." Note: Use $63.800 (Danish decimal point is comma? Actually in Danish, thousands separator is dot, decimal is comma. But for USD amounts, often keep the original format with comma as thousands? In Danish, we write $63.800 (dot as thousands) but also common to use comma? Better to follow Danish convention: $63.800 (dot) or $63,800? The original uses comma as thousands separator. In Danish, we use dot as thousands separator and comma as decimal. So $63,800 would be $63.800. But to avoid confusion, I'll keep the original format with comma? The requirement says "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" - so the number should be the same. I'll keep the comma as in original, but in Danish text it might look odd. However, many Danish crypto sites use comma as thousands. I'll keep as original: $63,800. But note: in Danish, we write "63.800" with dot. I'll decide to use the original format to preserve accuracy. Actually the original has "63,800" with comma. I'll keep that. Similarly for $60,000. So I'll keep commas. Second paragraph: "Why the strikes hit crypto" -> "Hvorfor angrebene rammer krypto" (or "Hvorfor angrebene påvirker krypto"? Better: "Hvorfor angrebene rammer krypto") Then the text: "Geopolitical shocks tend to trigger a flight to safety, and crypto is still treated as a risk asset by most institutional players. The immediate reaction is likely selling pressure. But the market was already in deep fear territory before the strikes — the Fear & Greed Index sat at 27. That means much of the negative sentiment may already be priced in. The sell-off could be shallower than some expect, especially if de-escalation signals emerge quickly." Danish: "Geopolitiske chok har en tendens til at udløse en flugt til sikkerhed, og krypto behandles stadig som et risikoaktiv af de fleste institutionelle aktører. Den umiddelbare reaktion er sandsynligvis salgspres. Men markedet var allerede i dyb frygt før angrebene – Fear & Greed Index lå på 27. Det betyder, at meget af den negative stemning allerede kan være indpriset. Frasalget kan være mindre dybt, end nogle forventer, især hvis deeskaleringssignaler opstår hurtigt." Note: "sell-off" translated as "frasalg" but "frasalg" might be too literal. "Salgspres" is selling pressure. I used "salgspres" earlier. For "sell-off" I'll use "frasalg" or "udsalg"? Better: "frasalget" (the sell-off). Also "shallower" -> "mindre dybt" (less deep). "priced in" -> "indpriset" (common term). Next: the market snapshot div. Keep the div structure, translate labels. "24h Change" -> "24h ændring", "7d Change" -> "7d ændring", "Fear & Greed" -> "Fear & Greed", "Sentiment" -> "Sentiment". The values: "+0.80%" keep, "-0.20%" keep, "27 Fear" -> "27 Frygt" (but original has "27 Fear" so translate "Fear" to "Frygt". "slightly bearish" -> "let bearish". Also "Bitcoin (BTC):" keep, "$63,887" keep, "Rank #1" keep. Then h2: "Iran's mining exposure" -> "Irans minedriftseksponering" or "Irans eksponering inden for minedrift". Better: "Irans minedriftseksponering". Paragraph: "What most coverage misses is the direct impact on