" (or "10-dobling af udbuddet"? But "10x" is common, we can keep "10x" or say "10-dobling". I'll use "10x" as it's understood.
Then: "The token originally launched as ai16z on Solana in October 2024. It rebranded to ElizaOS in January 2025. But the migration came with a controversial move: the supply ballooned from 1.1 billion to 11 billion tokens. That supply increase is now at the center of a federal class action lawsuit filed by law firm Burwick in the Southern District of New York on April 22, 2026. The complaint alleges false advertising, deceptive practices, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment."
Translation: "Tokenet blev oprindeligt lanceret som ai16z på Solana i oktober 2024. Det blev omdøbt til ElizaOS i januar 2025. Men migrationen kom med et kontroversielt træk: udbuddet voksede fra 1,1 milliard til 11 milliarder tokens. Denne udbudsstigning er nu i centrum for en føderal class action-søgsmål, der er indgivet af advokatfirmaet Burwick i Southern District of New York den 22. april 2026. Klagen hævder vildledende reklame, vildledende praksis, uagtsom urigtig fremstilling og uretmæssig berigelse."
Note: "class action" is often used in Danish as "class action" or "gruppesøgsmål". I'll use "class action-søgsmål" or "gruppesøgsmål"? Since it's a legal term, maybe "class action" is understood. I'll use "class action-søgsmål" to be clear.
Third paragraph: "
What the lawsuit says
" -> "
Hvad søgsmålet siger
"
Then: "On-chain data cited in the suit shows losses across at least 3,945 customer wallets. Total class harm is estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The lawsuit challenges the token migration itself, arguing it was structured to benefit insiders at the expense of retail holders. Burwick is seeking damages and disgorgement of profits."
Translation: "On-chain-data, der er citeret i søgsmålet, viser tab på tværs af mindst 3.945 kundewallets. Den samlede skade for klassen anslås til hundredvis af millioner af dollars. Søgsmålet udfordrer selve tokenmigrationen og argumenterer for, at den var struktureret til at gavne insidere på bekostning af detailholdere. Burwick kræver erstatning og tilbagebetaling af overskud."
Note: "wallets" – in Danish, "wallets" is used, or "tegnebøger"? But in crypto context, "wallets" is common. I'll keep "wallets". "retail holders" -> "detailholdere" or "detailinvestorer"? I'll use "detailholdere".
Fourth paragraph: "
Walters' side of the story
" -> "
Walters' side af historien
" (or "Walters' version"? I'll use "Walters' side af historien")
Then: "Walters claims he never sold his ai16z holdings and drew only a modest salary comparable to other engineers. He says he no longer owns any tokens and will never attach a token to Eliza again. In a statement that effectively ended the project, Walters said he wants the industry to move away from a casino mentality and focus on building real products. He added that he has turned bearish on crypto but remains optimistic about AI."
Translation: "Walters hævder, at han aldrig solgte sine ai16z-beholdninger og kun trak en beskeden løn, der kan sammenlignes med andre ingeniører. Han siger, at han ikke længere ejer nogen tokens og aldrig vil knytte et token til Eliza igen. I en erklæring, der reelt afsluttede projektet, sagde Walters, at han ønsker, at branchen skal bevæge sig væk fra en kasinomentality og fokusere på at bygge rigtige produkter. Han tilføjede, at han er blevet bearish på krypto, men forbliver optimistisk omkring AI."
Note: "bearish" is used in Danish as well. "casino mentality" -> "kasinomentality" or "kasinotankegang"? I'll use "kasinomentality" as it's common.
Fifth paragraph: "
