Loading market data...

El índice de precios al productor de China sube un 3,5% en julio, según la NBS

El índice de precios al productor de China sube un 3,5% en julio, según la NBS

and

tags. Let's translate paragraph by paragraph. First paragraph: "China's producer price index climbed 3.5% in July from a year earlier, the National Bureau of Statistics reported. The reading tracks how much domestic producers are getting for their goods at the factory gate." Translation: "El índice de precios al productor de China subió un 3,5% en julio en comparación con el año anterior, informó la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas. La lectura rastrea cuánto reciben los productores nacionales por sus productos a la salida de fábrica." But we have "NBS" in title, but here we have "National Bureau of Statistics" - we can translate as "Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" or keep as "National Bureau of Statistics"? Since it's a proper noun, we can keep it in English or translate? The requirement says keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form. So we should keep "National Bureau of Statistics" as is? But it's an organization name, so we can keep it. However, in Spanish, it's common to translate it. But to be safe, we'll keep it as "National Bureau of Statistics" or use "NBS" if we want. The instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" so we keep "National Bureau of Statistics" as is. But in the title we used NBS, so we can use NBS in the content as well? Actually, the content says "the National Bureau of Statistics reported" - we can translate as "informó la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" but that would be translating the name. I think it's acceptable to translate the name because it's a descriptive name. But to be consistent, maybe keep it as "National Bureau of Statistics" or use "NBS". Let's check: In the original, it says "the National Bureau of Statistics reported" - we can say "informó la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" but that is a translation. Since the requirement says keep proper nouns, I think it's okay to keep the English name. However, in many Spanish articles, they translate it. I'll go with translating to "Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" because it's more natural for Spanish readers, but the instruction says keep proper nouns. Hmm. Actually, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we should keep "National Bureau of Statistics" as is. But then the title uses NBS, which is an acronym. We can keep NBS. Let's decide: I'll keep "National Bureau of Statistics" in the content as is, but in the title we have "NBS" so we'll keep that. Actually, the title says "NBS Says" so we translate as "según la NBS" but NBS is an acronym, so we keep it. So in the content, we can say "informó la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" or "informó el National Bureau of Statistics"? I think it's better to translate the name because it's a government agency, but the instruction says keep proper nouns. I'll keep it as "National Bureau of Statistics" to be safe, but then the Spanish reader might not know what it is. However, we can also use "NBS" if we want. Let's see the original: "the National Bureau of Statistics reported" - we can say "informó la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas" but that is a translation. Since the instruction says keep proper nouns, I'll keep the English name. But then we have "NBS" in the title, so it's fine. I'll keep "National Bureau of Statistics" in the content. Actually, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so we keep "National Bureau of Statistics" as is. So I'll do that. So first paragraph: "El índice de precios al productor de China subió un 3,5% en julio en comparación con el año anterior, informó el National Bureau of Statistics. La lectura rastrea cuánto reciben los productores nacionales por sus productos a la salida de fábrica." But "climbed" is "subió" or "aumentó". I'll use "subió". Second paragraph: "

What the index measures

" -> "

Qué mide el índice

" Then: "The producer price index, or PPI, captures the average change in selling prices that domestic producers receive for their output. It covers everything from raw materials to finished products, and it's a different beast from the consumer price index, which looks at what shoppers pay on store shelves." Translation: "El índice de precios al productor, o IPP, captura el cambio promedio en los precios de venta que los productores nacionales reciben por su producción. Cubre desde materias primas hasta productos terminados, y es algo muy distinto del índice de precios al consumidor, que observa lo que pagan los compradores en los estantes de las tiendas." We need to keep PPI as IPP? Actually, PPI is the acronym for producer price index. In Spanish, it's IPP (índice de precios al productor). So we can use IPP. But the original says "producer price index, or PPI" - we can say "índice de precios al productor, o IPP" to keep the acronym. That's fine. "it's a different beast" - we can say "es algo muy distinto" or "es una cosa muy diferente". I'll use "es algo muy distinto". Next paragraph: "Because production costs often move before retail prices, the PPI is seen as an early warning system for inflationary pressure. When producers pay more for inputs, they might raise their own prices later, and that can ripple through the economy." Translation: "Debido a que los costos de producción suelen moverse antes que los precios minoristas, el IPP se considera un sistema de alerta temprana para la presión inflacionaria. Cuando los productores pagan más por los insumos, podrían subir sus propios precios más tarde, y eso puede repercutir en toda la economía." Next: "

The July figure

" -> "

La cifra de julio

" Then: "The 3.5% year-over-year gain means goods leaving factories and other production sites cost 3.5% more than they did in the same month last year. The statistics bureau didn't break down the number by sector or product category in its release, so the headline figure is all we have to work with." Translation: "El aumento interanual del 3,5% significa que los bienes que salen de las fábricas y otros sitios de producción cuestan un 3,5% más que en el mismo mes del año pasado. La oficina de estadísticas no desglosó la cifra por sector o categoría de producto en su comunicado, así que la cifra principal es todo lo que tenemos para trabajar." We have "The statistics bureau" - we can say "La oficina de estadísticas" but we earlier kept "National Bureau of Statistics" so maybe we say "La oficina de estadísticas" as a reference. But we can also say "El National Bureau of Statistics" but that's long. I'll use "La oficina de estadísticas" because it's a generic reference. Next: "That single number still tells a story. It's a measure of how much pricing power producers have right now, and it's a sign of how quickly costs are moving through the industrial supply chain." Translation: "Ese único número aún cuenta una historia. Es una medida de cuánto poder de fijación de precios tienen los productores en este momento, y es una señal de qué tan rápido se mueven los costos