Loading market data...

Coldcard Exploit Drains $89M, Bitcoin Flows to Exchanges in Reversal of FTX-Era Behavior

Coldcard Exploit Drains $89M, Bitcoin Flows to Exchanges in Reversal of FTX-Era Behavior

The $89 million hole

-> Dutch: "

Het gat van 89 miljoen dollar

" or "Het 89 miljoen dollar gat" but better "Het gat van 89 miljoen dollar". Then:

The exploit, which came to light this week, appears to have compromised a specific batch of Coldcard devices. The exact attack vector hasn't been publicly confirmed by the manufacturer, but blockchain sleuths tracked the stolen coins moving through multiple mixers and exchanges. Coldcard, a popular brand among bitcoin maximalists, has not yet issued a full post-mortem. The $89 million figure represents the total value of bitcoin siphoned from users' wallets.

Dutch: "De exploit, die deze week aan het licht kwam, lijkt een specifieke batch Coldcard-apparaten te hebben gecompromitteerd. Het exacte aanvalsvector is niet openlijk bevestigd door de fabrikant, maar blockchain-speurders volgden de gestolen munten terwijl ze door meerdere mixers en exchanges bewogen. Coldcard, een populair merk onder bitcoin-maximalisten, heeft nog geen volledige post-mortem uitgebracht. Het cijfer van 89 miljoen dollar vertegenwoordigt de totale waarde van bitcoin die uit de wallets van gebruikers is afgetapt." We need to use "attack vector" - "aanvalsvector" is okay. "blockchain sleuths" - "blockchain-speurders" is fine. "post-mortem" - often used as is, but we can say "postmortem" or "evaluatie". I'll keep "post-mortem" as it's common. Next:

Bitcoin moves to exchanges — a reversal

-> "

Bitcoin beweegt naar exchanges – een omkering

" or "Bitcoin stroomt naar exchanges – een omkering" but the original says "moves" so "beweegt" is fine. I'll use "stroomt" because it's more natural for funds. Actually "moves" is generic, but "flows" is used in the title. I'll use "stroomt" to be consistent. Then:

Data from Glassnode shows a net inflow of bitcoin to centralized exchanges over the past 48 hours, driven largely by Coldcard users. This is the opposite of what happened after FTX's implosion, when investors pulled coins off exchanges en masse to hold them in self-custody. The current flow suggests that some users now see exchange custody as safer than hardware wallets — at least for the moment.

Dutch: "Data van Glassnode toont een netto-instroom van bitcoin naar gecentraliseerde exchanges in de afgelopen 48 uur, grotendeels gedreven door Coldcard-gebruikers. Dit is het tegenovergestelde van wat