Loading market data...

Lawsuit Targets Trump

Lawsuit Targets Trump

,

etc. Let's go paragraph by paragraph: Original: "President Donald Trump was sued on August 12 in federal court in Manhattan over Truth API, the paid feed that delivers his Truth Social posts to subscribers for as much as $100,000 a month. The lawsuit, filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, the Public Integrity Project, and Altshuler Berzon LLP, calls the arrangement "extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional." The suit lands less than a week after Trump Media terminated its CRO venture with Crypto.com." Translation: "President Donald Trump ble saksøkt 12. august i føderal domstol på Manhattan over Truth API, den betalte strømmen som leverer hans Truth Social-innlegg til abonnenter for opptil 100 000 dollar i måneden. Søksmålet, anlagt av Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Yale Law Schools Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, Public Integrity Project og Altshuler Berzon LLP, kaller ordningen «ekstraordinær, korrupt og grunnlovsstridig». Søksmålet kommer mindre enn en uke etter at Trump Media avsluttet sitt CRO-samarbeid med Crypto.com." We need to keep proper nouns: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (maybe keep as is? Or translate? It's a name, so keep original. Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic - keep. Public Integrity Project - keep. Altshuler Berzon LLP - keep. CRO is a token name, keep. Crypto.com keep. Next h2: "The constitutional argument" -> "Det konstitusjonelle argumentet" or "Det grunnlovsmessige argumentet". Use "Det konstitusjonelle argumentet" is fine. Paragraph: "The complaint argues that the First Amendment guarantees equal access to presidential announcements. Charging $100,000 a month for a feed of the president's posts, the plaintiffs say, turns a public statement into a private commodity. The Fifth Amendment, they add, bars the government from demanding unreasonable sums for access to official communications. The suit asks the court to stop the program entirely." Translation: "Klagen argumenterer for at First Amendment garanterer lik tilgang til presidentens kunngjøringer. Å kreve 100 000 dollar i måneden for en strøm av presidentens innlegg, sier saksøkerne, gjør en offentlig uttalelse til en privat vare. Fifth Amendment, legger de til, forbyr regjeringen å kreve urimelige summer for tilgang til offisielle kommunikasjoner. Søksmålet ber retten om å stoppe programmet helt." We should keep "First Amendment" and "Fifth Amendment" as they are legal terms, often kept in English or translated? In Norwegian, they are often referred to as "First Amendment" and "Fifth Amendment" or "den første grunnlovsendringen" etc. But since it's US law, it's common to keep the English. We'll keep them. Next h2: "How the feed works" -> "Slik fungerer strømmen" or "Hvordan strømmen fungerer". We'll use "Slik fungerer strømmen". Paragraph: "Truth API launched on August 1 as a business-to-business subscription. It carries low-latency access to posts from the ten most-followed Truth Social accounts, including @realDonaldTrump, @WhiteHouse, and Vice President JD Vance. The price is $100,000 a month, or $60,000 for customers who commit to three years. More than ten customers have signed, according to interim CEO Kevin McGurn in the company's second-quarter release." Translation: "Truth API ble lansert 1. august som et business-to-business-abonnement. Den gir lav latens-tilgang til innlegg fra de ti mest fulgte Truth Social-kontoene, inkludert @realDonaldTrump, @WhiteHouse og visepresident JD Vance. Prisen er 100 000 dollar i måneden, eller 60 000 dollar for kunder som forplikter seg til tre år. Mer enn ti kunder har signert, ifølge midlertidig konsernsjef Kevin McGurn i selskapets andre kvartalsrapport." We need to translate "low-latency" - maybe "lav ventetid" or "lav latens". Use "lav latens" as it's common in tech. Next paragraph: "Direct buyers are primarily high-frequency trading firms that ingest the posts to inform algorithmic trading. McGurn said the company would disrupt scrapers that collect the same posts for free." Translation: "Direkte kjøpere er hovedsakelig høyfrekvenshandelsfirmaer som henter inn innleggene for å informere algoritmisk handel. McGurn sa at selskapet ville forstyrre skrapere som samler de samme innleggene gratis." "disrupt" - could be "forstyrre" or "utfordre". Use "forstyrre" but maybe "stoppe" or "motarbeide"? Actually "disrupt" in business context often means "forstyrre" but here they mean they will go after scrapers. We'll say "ville forstyrre" or "ville gå etter". Let's use "ville forstyrre" but maybe better "ville motarbeide" or "ville sette en stopper for". I'll use "ville forstyrre" but it's a bit off. Actually "disrupt scrapers" means to break their scraping. So "ville forstyrre skrapere" is okay. Next h2: "The prediction market pivot" -> "Prediksjonsmarkedsskiftet" or "Vendingen mot prediksjonsmarkeder". Use "Prediksjonsmarkedsskiftet". Paragraph: "McGurn said during the earnings call that Trump Media is evaluating licensing the feed to prediction market operators and is weighing deals with large language model developers. The complaint quotes those remarks, describing the prediction market plan as one that would facilitate betting on the president's announcements." Translation: "McGurn sa under resultatkonferansen at Trump Media vurderer å lisensiere strømmen til prediksjonsmarkedsoperatører og veier avtaler med utviklere av store språkmodeller. Klagen siterer disse bemerkningene og beskriver prediksjonsmarkedsplanen som en som ville legge til rette for veddemål på presidentens kunngjøringer." "earnings call" - resultatkonferanse or "inntektssamtale"? In Norwegian business, "resultatkonferanse" is common. Use that. Next paragraph: "That pivot comes as Trump Media terminated its Trump Media Group CRO Strategy venture with Crypto.com on August 7. Cronos (CRO) fell under $0.05, its lowest price since October 2023. Both companies now plan a marketing agreement putting Crypto.com's prediction markets in front of Truth Social users, replacing the embedded integration announced in October 2025 that lifted CRO 10% in an hour. McGurn said the sector is already crowded with established companies, and Intercontinental Exchange has committed around $2 billion to Polymarket." Translation: "Dette skiftet kommer ettersom Trump Media avsluttet sitt Trump Media Group CRO Strategy-samarbeid med Crypto.com 7. august. Cronos (CRO) falt under 0,05 dollar, det laveste nivået siden oktober 2023. Begge selskapene planlegger nå en markedsføringsavtale som plasserer Crypto.coms prediksjonsmarkeder foran Truth Social-brukere, og erstatter den integrerte integrasjonen som ble kunngjort i oktober 2025 og løftet CRO 10 % på én time. McGurn sa at sektoren allerede er overfylt med etablerte selskaper, og Intercontinental Exchange har forpliktet rundt 2 milliarder dollar til Polymarket." Note: "CRO Strategy venture" - keep as is? Maybe "CRO Strategy-satsingen" or just "CRO Strategy-samarbeidet". We'll keep "CRO Strategy-samarbeidet". Also "embedded integration" - "integrert integrasjon" is redundant, better "den integrerte løsningen" or "den innebygde integrasjonen".