Fee and add-ons
The transfer fee includes add-ons that could raise the total to €36 million. The base amount and the conditions attached to the add-ons were not disclosed. Payment terms were also kept private.
Chalobah leaves Chelsea
Chalobah now joins Como after leaving Chelsea. He will link up with his new teammates ahead of the club's next fixtures. No contract length has been announced.
Investment by Como
The deal represents a major investment for Como. The club have paid a significant fee to secure Chalobah's services. The exact structure of the deal remains unclear.
Further details, including the payment schedule and any performance clauses, have not been made public.
We need to translate this into Polish. Keep HTML tags. Also translate headings. Meta description: "Como have signed Trevoh Chalobah from Chelsea for a fee that could reach €36 million. The clubs confirmed the deal, but details remain undisclosed." Let's translate each part. First, the title: I'll go with "Como pozyskuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea w umowie wartej do 36 mln euro" but maybe we can simplify: "Como podpisuje z Chelsea: Trevoh Chalobah za do 36 mln euro" but that's not accurate. Perhaps: "Como podpisuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea za kwotę do 36 mln euro" - I'll use that. But note: "Sign" is often translated as "podpisuje" or "pozyskuje" (acquires). Since it's a transfer, "pozyskuje" is common. Let's use "pozyskuje". Title: "Como pozyskuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea w umowie wartej do 36 mln euro" - that's a bit long but acceptable. Alternatively: "Como pozyskuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea za nawet 36 mln euro" - that's shorter. I'll go with: "Como pozyskuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea za nawet 36 mln euro" - but "nawet" means "even" which is fine. But the original says "Worth Up to €36m" so "wartej do 36 mln euro" is more precise. I'll use "w umowie wartej do 36 mln euro" but then it's longer. Let's decide: "Como pozyskuje Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea w umowie wartej do 36 mln euro" - that's okay. Now content: First paragraph: "Como have signed Trevoh Chalobah from Chelsea in a deal that could be worth up to €36 million. The move was confirmed by both clubs." Translation: "Como pozyskało Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea w umowie, która może być warta do 36 milionów euro. Transfer został potwierdzony przez oba kluby." But note: "Como" is a club, in Polish we treat club names as neuter? Actually, "Como" is a city and club, often used as neuter? In Polish, we often use the name as it is, and the verb agrees with the subject. "Como" is a singular noun, so we say "Como pozyskało" (neuter) or "Como pozyskał" (masculine)? Usually, club names are treated as masculine inanimate? Actually, in Polish, club names are often used with the verb in the form that agrees with the gender of the club name. "Como" is a name, we can treat it as masculine? But many club names are treated as neuter? I think it's safer to use "Como" as a noun and use the verb form that matches the gender of the word "klub" (club) which is masculine. So "Como pozyskał" (masculine) or "Como pozyskało" (neuter)? Actually, in Polish, when we refer to a sports team, we often use the masculine form: "Chelsea wygrała" (but Chelsea is feminine? Actually, it's "Chelsea" as a club, we say "Chelsea wygrała" because "drużyna" is feminine? It's complicated. Usually, we treat club names as neuter? I think we can use the masculine form: "Como pozyskał" - but let's check common usage. For example, "Real Madryt wygrał" - masculine. "Barcelona wygrała" - feminine because "Barcelona" is a city? Actually, it's often "Barcelona wygrała" because "drużyna" (team) is feminine. So it depends. To be safe, we can use the impersonal form: "Como pozyskało" (neuter) or we can say "Klub Como pozyskał" but that's not in the original. I think we can use "Como pozyskało" because "Como" is a neuter noun? Actually, "Como" is a city, and in Polish, city names are neuter? Not necessarily. Let's check: "Como" is a proper noun, we can treat it as neuter. Many sources use "Como" with neuter verbs. For example, "Como wygrało" - I've seen that. So I'll use "Como pozyskało" (neuter past tense). But we need to be consistent. Let's use: "Como pozyskało Trevoha Chalobaha z Chelsea w umowie, która może być warta do 36 milionów euro. Transfer został potwierdzony przez oba kluby." Second heading: "Fee and add-ons" -> "Opłata i dodatki" or "Kwota transferu i bonusy" - but "add-ons" in football context are "dodatki" or "bonusy". I'll use "Opłata i dodatki" but maybe "Kwota i dodatki" is better. Let's use "Kwota transferu i dodatki" - but the heading is short. I'll use "Opłata i dodatki" - but "fee" is "opłata" or "kwota". Since it's a transfer fee, it's "kwota transferu". But the heading is "Fee and add-ons" so I'll translate as "Opłata i dodatki" or "Kwota i bonusy". I'll go with "Kwota i dodatki" - but "dodatki" is fine. Actually, in Polish football, we often say "kwota bazowa i bonusy" or "dodatki". I'll use "Kwota i dodatki". Third heading: "Chalobah leaves Chelsea" -> "Chalobah opuszcza Chelsea" - that's straightforward. Fourth heading: "Investment by Como" -> "Inwestycja Como" or "Inwestycja ze strony Como" - I'll use "Inwestycja Como". Now paragraphs: After first heading, we have: "The transfer fee includes add-ons that could raise the total to €36 million.
