,
tags. Let's translate: First paragraph: "Iran is not speaking directly to President Trump, and Moscow and Beijing are the reason. Russia and China have made sure Tehran doesn't have to sit at the same table with Washington, according to the current diplomatic landscape. That reliance on two of America's biggest rivals could stretch out indirect negotiations and slow any real progress between the U.S. and Iran." Translation: "Irani nuk po flet drejtpërdrejt me Presidentin Trump, dhe Moska e Pekini janë arsyeja. Rusia dhe Kina kanë siguruar që Teherani të mos ketë nevojë të ulet në të njëjtën tryezë me Uashingtonin, sipas peizazhit aktual diplomatik. Kjo mbështetje te dy rivalët më të mëdhenj të Amerikës mund të zgjasë negociatat indirekte dhe të ngadalësojë çdo përparim real midis SHBA-së dhe Iranit." Note: "Washington" can be translated as "Uashington" but in Albanian often "Washington" is used. But for consistency, we can use "Uashington" but it's fine. "re-in" is "Washington" - I'll use "Uashington" for the city. Actually, "Washington" is a proper noun, but it's common to translate to "Uashington" in Albanian. I'll keep it as "Uashington" but since it's a name, we can keep "Washington" as is. The requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so I'll keep "Washington" as "Washington". Similarly "Moscow" and "Beijing" are proper nouns, but they are commonly translated? Actually, "Moscow" is "Moska" in Albanian, "Beijing" is "Pekini". But they are proper nouns, but the instruction says keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form. However, "Moscow" and "Beijing" are city names, but in Albanian they have their own forms: "Moskë" or "Moska"? Typically "Moskë" for the city, but in this context it's used as metonymy for Russia and China. I think it's acceptable to use the Albanian forms: "Moska" and "Pekini". But the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form. But that might refer to names of people and companies, not necessarily geographical names? Actually, it says "proper nouns (names, company names)" - so it might include place names. But in translation, we often translate place names if they have established translations. For example, "Paris" is "Parisi" in Albanian, but it's still a proper noun. The instruction might be ambiguous. I'll keep the English names as they appear: "Moscow" and "Beijing" but in Albanian text, it's common to use "Moska" and "Pekini". Let's check: The article says "Moscow and Beijing" - in Albanian, we'd say "Moska dhe Pekini". But to follow the instruction strictly, we could keep "Moscow" and "Beijing" as is? That would look odd. I think the instruction means keep names of people and companies, not necessarily cities. But to be safe, I'll use the Albanian forms: "Moska" and "Pekini" because they are standard. Also "Washington" becomes "Uashington" but we can keep "Washington" as is. Actually, in Albanian, "Washington" is often used as "Uashington". I'll use "Uashington" for consistency. But the instruction says "keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so for "Trump" we keep "Trump", for "Russia" we can translate to "Rusia" (which is the Albanian name for Russia), but "Russia" is a country name, not a person. Hmm. I think it's acceptable to translate country names and city names to their Albanian equivalents, as that's standard translation practice. The instruction likely means to keep names of people, companies, brands, etc. So I'll translate "Russia" to "Rusia", "China" to "Kina", "Moscow" to "Moska", "Beijing" to "Pekini", "Washington" to "Uashington" (or "Washington" but I'll use "Uashington" for the city, but also "Washington" can refer to the government, so I'll use "Uashington" for the city and "SHBA" for USA). But the article says "Washington" meaning the US government, so we can say "Uashington" or "SHBA" but it's fine. Let's proceed with natural Albanian. I'll translate the entire content. Second paragraph: "Iran's diplomatic strategy now runs through Moscow and Beijing. Both countries have provided enough political cover for Iran to avoid direct engagement with the Trump administration. The arrangement means Iranian officials can keep their distance while still having a channel to negotiate — just not one that runs straight to the White House." Translation: "Strategjia diplomatike e Iranit tani kalon nëpër Moskë dhe Pekin. Të dy vendet kanë sigurduar mbulim të mjaftueshëm politik për Iranin që të shmangë angazhimin e drejtpërdrejtë me administratën e Trump. Kjo marrëveshje nënkupton që zyrtarët iranianë mund të ruajë distancën e tyre ndërsa ende kanë një kanal për të negociuar — vetëm se jo një që shkon drejt e në Shtëpinë e Bardhë." Note: "White House" is "Shtëpia e Bardhë" in Albanian. Third paragraph: "That's not an accident. Russia and China have their own interests in keeping the U.S.-Iran standoff from resolving too quickly. By propping up Iran's position, they gain leverage in their own dealings with Washington, and they keep Tehran dependent on their support." Translation: "Kjo nuk është një rastësi. Rusia dhe Kina kanë interesat e tyre për të mos lejuar që ngërçi SHBA-Iran të zgjidhet shumë shpejt. Duke forcuar pozitën e Iranit, ata fitojnë levë në marrëdhëniet e tyre me Washington-in, dhe e mbajë Teheranin të varur nga mbështetja e tyre." Note: "Washington" - I'll use "Washington" as is, or "Uashington"? I'll use "Washington" to be consistent with original. But in Albanian, it's often "Uashington". I'll use "Washington" for simplicity, but maybe "Uashington" is more standard. I'll use "Uashington" in the translation. Fourth paragraph: "The practical effect is that negotiations stay indirect. Messages pass through intermediaries, positions get filtered, and the pace slows. Iran's reliance on Russian and Chinese diplomatic machinery doesn't just shape its posture — it also sets the tempo. Every step in the process has to be coordinated with allies who aren't in the room with the U.S." Translation: "Efekti praktik është se negociatat mbeten indirekte. Mesazhet kalojnë nëpër ndërmjetës, pozicionet filtrohen, dhe ritmi ngadalësohet. Varësia e Iranit nga mekanizmi diplomatik i Rusisë dhe Kinës nuk formon vetëm qëndrimin e tij — ajo gjithashtu vendos tempin. Çdo hap në proces duhet të koordinohet me aleatët që nuk janë në dhomë me SHBA-në." Fifth paragraph: "That could drag things out. Direct talks are often the fastest way to resolve differences, but Iran isn't in a position to take that route. As long as Moscow and Beijing keep Iran under their wing, any move toward a direct dialogue with Trump becomes harder to make." Translation: "Kjo mund të zgjasë gjërat. Bisedat e drejtpërdrejta janë shpesh mënyra më e shpejtë për të zgjidhur diferencat, por Irani nuk është n
