as in original. Also note that the original content has a subheading "Gold’s long-shot bet on $10,000" which is an h2, and "What to watch next" also h2. So we need to keep those.
Also, note that the original article has a line: "The 4.463% level on the three-year note is a symptom of that shift. Investors are demanding higher compensation for the risk of holding British bonds, even on shorter maturities that are usually seen as safer." In my translation
