" or "Fejlen og dens eftervirkninger". "fallout" means consequences. I'll use "konsekvenser".
Then: "Taylor Hornby found the bug on May 29. It allowed a crafted proof to create counterfeit ZEC within Orchard's shielded environment. Shielded Labs later reproduced the exploit in a local test. Because Orchard's privacy design prevents cryptographic reconstruction of past transactions, there's no way to know if anyone abused the hole before it was patched. The Zcash community reported no evidence of altered supply or user losses, but the disclosure still hit prices hard. ZEC dropped from roughly $624 to $309 in the 48 hours after the news broke."
Translation: "Taylor Hornby fandt fejlen den 29. maj. Den gjorde det muligt for et konstrueret bevis at skabe forfalsket ZEC inden for Orchard's shielded-miljø. Shielded Labs gengav senere udnyttelsen i en lokal test. Fordi Orchard's privatlivsdesign forhindrer kryptografisk rekonstruktion af tidligere transaktioner, er der ingen måde at vide, om nogen misbrugte hullet, før det blev rettet. Zcash-fællesskabet rapporterede ingen beviser for ændret udbud eller brugertab, men offentliggørelsen ramte stadig priserne hårdt. ZEC faldt fra cirka $624 til $309 i de 48 timer efter nyheden brød ud."
We need to be careful with "crafted proof" - maybe "konstrueret bevis" or "specialfremstillet bevis". I'll use "konstrueret bevis". Also "shielded environment" -> "shielded-miljø". "reproduced the exploit" -> "gengav udnyttelsen" or "reproducerede udnyttelsen". I'll use "reproducerede". "abused the hole" -> "misbrugte hullet". "patched" -> "rettet" or "patchet". I'll use "rettet". "disclosure" -> "offentliggørelse" or "afsløring". I'll use "offentliggørelsen". "hit prices hard" -> "ramte priserne hårdt".
Third paragraph: "
What Ironwood changes
" -> "
Hvad Ironwood ændrer
" or "Hvad Ironwood forandrer". I'll use "Hvad Ironwood ændrer".
Then: "Ironwood's accounting rules are the key fix. They prevent any excess coins from continuing to circulate out of the old Orchard pool. From activation onward, holders get a verifiable supply ceiling — a hard cap that can be checked on-chain. User migrations from Orchard to the new Ironwood pool are visible, giving the network a transparent record of the transition. The upgrade effectively quarantines the old pool and starts fresh under stricter rules."
Translation: "Ironwood's regnskabsregler er den vigtigste rettelse. De forhindrer, at overskydende mønter fortsætter med at cirkulere ud af den gamle Orchard-pulje. Fra aktivering og fremefter får indehavere et verificerbart udbudsloft — en hård grænse, der kan kontrolleres på kæden. Brugeroverførsler fra Orchard til den nye Ironwood-pulje er synlige, hvilket giver netværket en transparent registrering af overgangen. Opgraderingen sætter effektivt den gamle pulje i karantæne og starter frisk under strengere regler."
Note: "on-chain" -> "på kæden" or "on-chain". In Danish crypto context, we might keep "on-chain" but we can say "på blockchain" or "på kæden". I'll use "på kæden" for brevity, but it might be understood. Alternatively, "on-chain" is common. I'll use "on-chain" as it's a technical term. Actually, we need to be consistent. I'll use "on-chain" because it's widely used in Danish crypto articles. So: "der kan kontrolleres on-chain". Also "accounting rules" -> "regnskabsregler" or "bogføringsregler". I'll use "regnskabsregler". "excess coins" -> "overskydende mønter" or "overskydende coins". I'll use "overskydende mønter" but maybe "coins" is used. I'll use "mønter" but "ZEC" is the coin, so maybe "overskydende ZEC" but it says "coins" generally. I'll say "overskydende mønter". "supply ceiling" -> "udbudsloft". "hard cap" -> "hård grænse" or "hårdt loft". I'll use "hård grænse" but "loft" is common. I'll use "hårdt loft". Actually, "hard cap" in crypto is often "hårdt loft" or "hård grænse".
