Loading market data...

Chip Stocks Drag KOSPI, Nikkei Lower as Memory Selloff Deepens

Chip Stocks Drag KOSPI, Nikkei Lower as Memory Selloff Deepens

headings. Translate paragraphs. Let's translate paragraph by paragraph. First paragraph: "KOSPI reversed an early gain to close down more than 1% on Friday, while Japan's Nikkei also gave back its opening advance, as a selloff in memory chip stocks deepened. Weak overnight trading on Wall Street added to the pressure." Translation: "Le KOSPI a effacé un gain initial pour clôturer en baisse de plus de 1% vendredi, tandis que le Nikkei japonais a également abandonné son avance d'ouverture, alors que la vente de valeurs de puces mémoire s'est intensifiée. La faiblesse des échanges nocturnes à Wall Street a ajouté à la pression." But "memory chip stocks" -> "valeurs de puces mémoire" or "actions de puces mémoire". I'll use "actions de puces mémoire". Also "selloff" -> "vente" or "déroute". I'll use "vente" but "déroute" might be better. Let's use "déroute" for selloff? Actually "selloff" is often "vente massive" or "déroute". I'll use "déroute" for consistency. But in the title we used "vente". Let's be consistent: "déroute" is more dramatic. I'll use "déroute" for selloff. So: "alors que la déroute des actions de puces mémoire s'est intensifiée." Also "Weak overnight trading" -> "La faiblesse des échanges de nuit" or "des échanges nocturnes". I'll use "nocturnes". Second paragraph: "The KOSPI opened 1.1% higher at 6,365.07 and climbed to 6,415.60 before sliding to 6,221.60, down 74.79 points, or 1.19%, from Thursday's close of 6,296.39. The Nikkei opened above its previous close at 65,746.13, then reversed to 65,193.16, losing 489.88 points, or 0.75%. The index ranged between 64,651.49 and 65,990.72." Translation: "Le KOSPI a ouvert en hausse de 1,1% à 6 365,07 et a grimpé jusqu'à 6 415,60 avant de glisser à 6 221,60, en baisse de 74,79 points, soit 1,19%, par rapport à la clôture de jeudi de 6 296,39. Le Nikkei a ouvert au-dessus de sa clôture précédente à 65 746,13, puis a inversé la tendance à 65 193,16, perdant 489,88 points, soit 0,75%. L'indice a oscillé entre 64 651,49 et 65 990,72." Note: Use French number formatting: spaces for thousands, comma for decimals? Actually in French, we use comma as decimal separator and space for thousands. But in financial contexts, sometimes they keep the original format? The instruction says "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" so we should keep the numbers as they are? But in French, we typically use comma for decimals. However, the original uses periods for decimals and commas for thousands? Actually original: "6,365.07" - that's using comma as thousands separator and period as decimal. In French, it's the opposite: space for thousands, comma for decimal. So we should convert to French format: "6 365,07" etc. But the instruction says "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" - that means the values must be the same, but we can format them according to French conventions. I'll do that: use space for thousands and comma for decimals. So: "6 365,07" instead of "6,365.07". Also "74.79" -> "74,79". "1.19%" -> "1,19%". "6,296.39" -> "6 296,39". "65,746.13" -> "65 746,13". "65,193.16" -> "65 193,16". "489.88" -> "489,88". "0.75%" -> "0,75%". "64,651.49" -> "64 651,49". "65,990.72" -> "65 990,72". Also "1.1%" -> "1,1%". I'll do that. Third paragraph: "SK Hynix sank 4.82% to 1,423,000 won, leading the decline among chipmakers. Kioxia, the Japanese flash-memory maker, dropped 2.03% to 47,750 yen. SoftBank Group slid 3.69% to 5,485 yen. Samsung Electronics, however, bucked the trend, adding 0.43% to 231,500 won." Translation: "SK Hynix a chuté de 4,82% à 1 423 000 wons, menant la baisse parmi les fabricants de puces. Kioxia, le fabricant japonais de mémoires flash, a reculé de 2,03% à 47 750 yens. SoftBank Group a glissé de 3,69% à 5 485 yens. Samsung Electronics, cependant, a résisté à la tendance, gagnant 0,43% à 231 500 wons." Note: "won" and "yen" are usually plural in French? Actually "won" is the currency, in French we say "wons" for plural? Usually we keep the same? I think we can say "wons" and "yens" but often they are invariable. I'll use "wons" and "yens" for clarity. Also "bucked the trend" -> "a résisté à la tendance" or "a fait exception". I'll use "a fait exception" maybe better: "a toutefois fait exception". But "bucked the trend" means went against the trend, so "a contre-carré la tendance" or "a résisté". I'll use "a toutefois résisté à la tendance". Fourth paragraph: "The selloff follows a multi-week slump in memory chip stocks. Citigroup and Jefferies both cut price targets on memory stocks this week. SanDisk's quarterly results beat estimates but failed to lift the outlook, leading to conservative guidance. Goldman Sachs said fully priced valuations leave chipmakers vulnerable to sharp drops." Translation: "Cette déroute fait suite à une chute de plusieurs semaines des actions de puces mémoire. Citigroup et Jefferies ont tous deux réduit leurs objectifs de cours sur les valeurs de mémoire cette semaine. Les résultats trimestriels de SanDisk ont dépassé les attentes mais n'ont pas réussi à améliorer les perspectives, conduisant à des prévisions prudentes. Goldman Sachs a déclaré que des valorisations pleinement intégrées rendent les fabricants de puces vulnérables à des chutes brutales." Note: "fully priced valuations" -> "des valorisations pleinement intégrées" or "des valorisations déjà intégrées" maybe "des valorisations qui intègrent déjà toutes les bonnes nouvelles" but I'll use "des valorisations pleinement intégrées" which is a bit literal. Better: "des valorisations déjà élevées" but the meaning is that they