so we need to translate that heading. Also we have
The $11 billion figure
and
What the CLARITY Act does
and
The bill's path forward
. So we need to translate those headings as well.
Let's translate the headings:
- "The $11 billion figure" -> "110억 달러 수치" or "110억 달러의 규모" but better: "110억 달러라는 수치" or simply "110억 달러 수치". We'll do "110억 달러 수치".
- "James's Senate testimony" -> "제임스의 상원 증언" (since we keep her name as is, but we can say "제임스 상원 증언" but better to include possessive: "제임스의 상원 증언".
- "What the CLARITY Act does" -> "CLARITY 법이 하는 일" or "CLARITY 법의 내용" but more natural: "CLARITY 법이 무엇을 하는가" but for heading, we can do "CLARITY 법의 역할" or "CLARITY 법의 내용". Since it's a heading, we can say "CLARITY 법이란 무엇인가" but the original is "What the CLARITY Act does" - we can translate as "CLARITY 법의 기능" or "CLARITY 법이 하는 것". Let's do "CLARITY 법의 내용" but that's not exact. I'll go with "CLARITY 법이 하는 일" but that's a bit informal. Actually in Korean news headings, they often use "CLARITY 법의 영향" but the section explains what it does. Let's do "CLARITY 법이란 무엇인가" but that's more like "What is the CLARITY Act?" The original is "What the CLARITY Act does" - we can say "CLARITY 법의 작동 방식" or "CLARITY 법의 역할". I'll use "CLARITY 법의 역할" for simplicity.
- "The bill's path forward" -> "법안의 향후 전망" or "법안의 진행 경로". We'll do "법안의 향후 경로" or "법안의 앞으로의 길". I'll use "법안의 향후 전망" but that might imply outlook. Let's do "법안의 향후 경로" as it's more literal.
Now translate the content under each heading.
After the first paragraph, we have the heading "The $11 billion figure" and then paragraph: "The FBI's tally covers everything from investment fraud to ransomware. It's a staggering number — and it's almost certainly an undercount. Many victims never report losses. The bureau says the figure reflects complaints filed with its Internet Crime Complaint Center. Crypto scams now account for a growing share of the total financial fraud the FBI tracks."
We already translated that above. So we'll structure the content with the headings.
Then "James's Senate testimony" paragraph: "Letitia James didn't mince words. She told senators the CLARITY Act would strip state attorneys general of key tools they use to go after bad actors. James has been one of the most aggressive state regulators on crypto. Her office has taken on exchanges, lenders, and promoters. She argued that the bill would preempt state laws without offering strong enough federal protections."
Translation
