etc. We need to translate those headings as well.
Let's list all headings:
- The $11 billion figure
- James's Senate testimony
- What the CLARITY Act does
- The bill's path forward
We need to translate them.
First heading: "The $11 billion figure" -> "110亿美元的数字" or "110亿美元的数据" but we can also say "110亿美元损失" but better to keep it as a heading. I'll translate as "110亿美元的数字" but that's literal. Maybe "110亿美元损失" is more natural. But the heading is about the figure, so I'll do "110亿美元的数字" but it's a bit awkward. Alternatively, "110亿美元损失" is fine. Since it's a heading, we can be concise. I'll do "110亿美元损失" but actually the heading is "The $11 billion figure" so it's about the figure itself. I'll do "110亿美元的数字" but maybe "110亿美元损失" is better because it's about losses. I'll check the context: the paragraph is about the FBI's tally. So heading could be "110亿美元损失" but it's a figure. I'll go with "110亿美元的数字" but let's see.
Actually, in Chinese news, they often use "110亿美元损失" as a heading. I'll do "110亿美元损失" for simplicity.
Second heading: "James's Senate testimony" -> "James的参议院证词" or "James在参议院的证词" I'll do "James的参议院证词" but we can also do "James参议院作证" but it's a heading, so I'll do "James的参议院证词".
Third heading: "What the CLARITY Act does" -> "CLARITY法案的内容" or "CLARITY法案的作用" I'll do "CLARITY法案的内容" but maybe "CLARITY法案是什么" but that's informal. I'll do "CLARITY法案的内容" or "CLARITY法案的作用" I'll go with "CLARITY法案的内容".
Fourth heading: "The bill's path forward" -> "该法案的前景" or "该法案的推进之路" I'll do "该法案的前景" but "path forward" implies future progress, so "该法案的未来走向" maybe. I'll do "该法案的前景" but that's a bit vague. I'll do "该法案的推进之路" but that's a bit literal. I'll do "该法案的未来" but let's see. I'll go with "该法案的前景" for simplicity.
Now translate each paragraph under headings.
Paragraph after first heading: "The FBI's tally covers everything from investment fraud to ransomware. It's a staggering number — and it's almost certainly an undercount. Many victims never report losses. The bureau says the figure reflects complaints filed with its Internet Crime Complaint Center. Crypto scams now account for a growing share of the total financial fraud the FBI tracks."
We already translated that above. So we'll put it after the first h2.
Paragraph after second heading: "Letitia James didn't mince words. She told senators the CLARITY Act would strip state attorneys general of key tools they use to go after bad actors. James has been one of the most aggressive state regulators on crypto. Her office has taken on exchanges, lenders, and promoters. She argued that the bill would preempt state laws without offering strong enough federal protections."
Translation: "Letitia James毫不客气。她告诉参议员们，CLARITY法案将剥夺各州总检察长用来追查不良行为者的关键工具。James一直是加密货币领域最积极进取的州监管者之一。她的办公室对交易所、贷款机构和推广者进行了打击。她辩称，该法案将取代州法律，却没有提供足够强大的联邦保护。"
We need to translate "didn't mince words" as "毫不客气" or "直言不讳" I'll use "直言不讳" maybe. Actually "didn't mince words" means she spoke bluntly. So "直言不讳" is good. Also "strip" -> 剥夺, "state attorneys general" -> 各州总检察长, "bad actors" ->
