Loading market data...

FBI Reports $11B in Crypto Losses; NY AG Warns CLARITY Act Would Weaken Enforcement

FBI Reports $11B in Crypto Losses; NY AG Warns CLARITY Act Would Weaken Enforcement

and

tags. We need to translate each paragraph and heading. Let's translate paragraph by paragraph. First paragraph: "The FBI says crypto-related losses topped $11 billion last year. That's the headline from a new report that landed this week. At the same time, New York Attorney General Letitia James is warning Congress that a pending bill could make things worse. She testified in the Senate that the CLARITY Act would weaken state enforcement against crypto scams." Translation: "افبیآی میگوید ضررهای مرتبط با کریپتو در سال گذشته از ۱۱ میلیارد دلار فراتر رفت. این تیتر یک گزارش جدید است که این هفته منتشر شد. در همین حال، لتیشیا جیمز، دادستان کل نیویورک، به کنگره هشدار میدهد که یک لایحه در انتظار میتواند اوضاع را بدتر کند. او در سنا شهادت داد که قانون CLARITY اجرای قانون ایالتی در برابر کلاهبرداریهای کریپتو را تضعیف میکند." We need to keep "Letitia James" as is. "CLARITY Act" as is. "Senate" can be "سنا". "state enforcement" - "اجرای قانون ایالتی". Second paragraph: "

The $11 billion figure

" - heading: "رقم ۱۱ میلیارد دلار" or "شکل ۱۱ میلیارد دلاری" but better "رقم ۱۱ میلیارد دلار" Then paragraph: "The FBI's tally covers everything from investment fraud to ransomware. It's a staggering number — and it's almost certainly an undercount. Many victims never report losses. The bureau says the figure reflects complaints filed with its Internet Crime Complaint Center. Crypto scams now account for a growing share of the total financial fraud the FBI tracks." Translation: "محاسبه افبیآی همه چیز را از کلاهبرداری سرمایهگذاری تا باجافزار پوشش میدهد. این رقم شگفتآور است - و تقریباً مطمئناً کمتر از واقع است. بسیاری از قربانیان هرگز ضررهای خود را گزارش نمیکنند. این اداره میگوید این رقم منعکسکننده شکایتهایی است که به مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی آن ارائه شده است. کلاهبرداریهای کریپتو اکنون سهم رو به رشدی از کل کلاهبرداریهای مالی که افبیآی ردیابی میکند را تشکیل میدهند." Note: "Internet Crime Complaint Center" - we can keep as is or translate? It's a proper name. We can keep "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی" but it's a specific center. I'll keep "Internet Crime Complaint Center" as is? But it's a proper noun, so we can keep it in English. But to be natural, we can translate it as "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی" but then it's not a proper noun. I'll keep it as "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی" but maybe it's fine. Actually, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - this is a government center, so it's a proper noun. I'll keep it as "Internet Crime Complaint Center" but that might be awkward. Alternatively, we can translate it as "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی افبیآی" but we can also keep the English. I'll translate it as "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی" and mention it's part of FBI. But to be safe, I'll keep the English name in parentheses? Actually, we need to translate naturally. I'll use "مرکز شکایت جرایم اینترنتی" and it's clear. Third paragraph: "

James's Senate testimony

" - heading: "شهادت جیمز در سنا" or "شهادت جیمز در مجلس سنا" Then paragraph: "Letitia James didn't mince words. She told senators the CLARITY Act would strip state attorneys general of key tools they use to go after bad actors. James has been one of the most aggressive state regulators on crypto. Her office has taken on exchanges, lenders, and promoters. She argued that the bill would preempt state laws without offering strong enough federal protections." Translation: "لتیشیا جیمز کلمات را کوتاه نکرد. او به سناتورها گفت که قانون CLARITY دادستانهای کل ایالتی را از ابزارهای کلیدی که برای تعقیب افراد بد استفاده میکنند محروم میکند. جیمز یکی از تهاجمی