. So we'll translate the heading.
Then the paragraph: "The plan targets two levers at once. First, it would change how transaction fees are handled. Currently, a portion of fees is burned, but the proposal would redirect a larger share to the burn mechanism. Second, it would double the disinflation rate — the rate at which new SOL issuance decreases over time. Together, the changes are designed to shrink the total supply of SOL faster than today's schedule."
Malay: "Pelan ini menyasarkan dua tuil sekaligus. Pertama, ia akan mengubah cara yuran transaksi dikendalikan. Pada masa ini, sebahagian yuran dibakar, tetapi cadangan itu akan mengalihkan bahagian yang lebih besar kepada mekanisme pembakaran. Kedua, ia akan menggandakan kadar disinflasi — kadar di mana terbitan SOL baharu berkurangan dari semasa ke semasa. Bersama-sama, perubahan ini direka untuk mengecilkan jumlah bekalan SOL lebih cepat daripada jadual hari ini."
We need to ensure "tuil" for levers, but maybe "mekanisme" is fine. "Terbitan" for issuance. "Berkurangan" for decreases. "Bekalan" for supply.
Third paragraph: "The numbers are stark. Daily SOL burns would jump from about $47,000 to $650,000 at current prices. That's a 13-fold increase. The proposal's authors argue the move would make Solana's tokenomics more aligned with long-term network health, though they didn't provide a specific rationale in the public draft."
Malay: "Angka-angka ini jelas. Pembakaran SOL harian akan melonjak daripada kira-kira $47,000 kepada $650,000 pada harga semasa. Itu peningkatan 13 kali ganda. Penulis cadangan berhujah bahawa langkah ini akan menjadikan tokenomik Solana lebih sejajar dengan kesihatan rangkaian jangka panjang, walaupun mereka tidak memberikan rasional khusus dalam draf awam."
"Tokenomik" is a term. "Sejajar" for aligned. "Kesihatan rangkaian" for network health. "Rasional" for rationale.
Fourth paragraph: "Why the burn matters" - heading. Translate as "Mengapa pembakaran penting" or "Kepentingan pembakaran". We'll use "Mengapa pembakaran penting".
Paragraph: "Burning tokens removes them from circulation permanently. For SOL holders, a higher burn rate means less supply over time, which can support price if demand holds steady. But the trade-off is that validators — the entities that run the network's infrastructure — earn less from fees and inflation rewards. That's why the proposal needs their backing."
Malay: "Membakar token mengeluarkannya daripada edaran secara kekal. Bagi pemegang SOL, kadar pembakaran yang lebih tinggi bermakna bekalan yang lebih rendah dari semasa ke semasa, yang boleh menyokong harga jika permintaan kekal stabil. Tetapi pertukarannya ialah pengesah — entiti yang menjalankan infrastruktur rangkaian — memperoleh kurang daripada yuran dan ganjaran inflasi. Sebab itu cadangan ini memerlukan sokongan mereka."
"Edaran" for circulation. "Pemegang" for holders. "Pertukaran" for trade-off. "Ganjaran inflasi" for inflation rewards.
Fifth paragraph: "Validators vote with their staked SOL. To pass, SGP-0003 requires a supermajority of votes from the total stake. Right now, the proposal has support from about 10 million SOL, but it needs roughly 50 million to pass. That leaves a gap of 40 million SOL that must be secured in the next two weeks."
Malay: "Pengesah mengundi dengan SOL yang dipertaruhkan. Untuk lulus, SGP-0003 memerlukan majoriti super undian daripada jumlah pertaruhan. Pada masa ini, cadangan itu mendapat sokongan daripada kira-kira 10 juta SOL, tetapi ia memerlukan kira-kira 50 juta untuk lulus. Itu meninggalkan jurang 40 juta SOL yang mesti diperoleh dalam dua minggu akan datang."
"Dipertaruhkan" for staked. "Majoriti super" for supermajority. "Pertaruhan" for stake. "Jurang" for gap.
Sixth paragraph: "The validator vote deadline" - heading. Translate as "Tarikh akhir undian pengesah" or "Masa undian pengesah". We'll use "Tarikh akhir undian pengesah".
Paragraph: "The clock is ticking. The proposal entered a two-week voting window on [date not specified in facts, so we can't invent a date]. If validators don't pledge enough stake by the deadline, the proposal will fail. Some validators have already signaled support, but many remain undecided. The outcome will depend on whether the larger validators — those with the most staked SOL — see the burn increase as worth the reduced rewards."
Malay: "Masa semakin suntuk. Cadangan itu memasuki tetingkap pengundian dua minggu pada [tarikh tidak dinyatakan dalam fakta, jadi kita tidak boleh mencipta tarikh]. Jika pengesah tidak menyerahkan cukup pertaruhan sebelum tarikh akhir, cadangan itu akan gagal. Sesetengah pengesah telah memberi isyarat sokongan, tetapi ramai yang masih belum membuat keputusan. Hasilnya akan bergantung kepada sama ada pengesah yang lebih besar — mereka yang mempunyai SOL yang paling banyak dipertaruhkan — melihat peningkatan pembakaran sebagai berbaloi dengan ganjaran yang dikurangkan."
We need to handle the date placeholder. The original says "[date not specified in facts, so we can't invent a date]" - that's actually a note from the translator? Actually the original article says "on [date not specified in facts, so we can't invent a date]" - that seems like a placeholder in the original? Actually the original content has that in brackets. It might be a note from the source. We should keep it as is, but translate the surrounding text. We'll keep the bracket as is, but translate the rest. So we'll write "pada [tarikh tidak dinyatakan dalam fakta, jadi kita tidak boleh mencipta tarikh]" but that's awkward. Actually the original says "on [date not specified in facts, so we can't invent a date]" - that is a note to the reader. We should translate that note as well. But it's part of the article. We'll translate it as "pada [tarikh tidak dinyatakan dalam fak
